Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 southeastern conference champs last 16 years1990 tennessee 5-1-11991 florida 7-0-01992 alabama 8-0-01993 florida 7-1-01994 florida 7-1-01995 florida 8-0-01996 florida 8-0-01997 tennessee 7-1-01998 tennessee 8-0-01999 alabama 7-1-02000 florida 7-1-02001 lsu 5-3-02002 georgia 7-1-02003 lsu 7-1-02004 auburn (al) 8-0-02005 georgia 6-2-02006 florida 7-1-0just one question if the sec is so tough and every team in the sec (yes all 12) is great and overloaded with talent why in the last 16 years have only 6 out of the 12 great teams in the sec, have won the conference title? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 southeastern conference champs last 16 years1990 tennessee 5-1-11991 florida 7-0-01992 alabama 8-0-01993 florida 7-1-01994 florida 7-1-01995 florida 8-0-01996 florida 8-0-01997 tennessee 7-1-01998 tennessee 8-0-01999 alabama 7-1-02000 florida 7-1-02001 lsu 5-3-02002 georgia 7-1-02003 lsu 7-1-02004 auburn (al) 8-0-02005 georgia 6-2-02006 florida 7-1-0just one question if the sec is so tough and every team in the sec (yes all 12) is great and overloaded with talent why in the last 16 years have only 6 out of the 12 great teams in the sec, have won the conference title? i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 southeastern conference champs last 16 years1990 tennessee 5-1-11991 florida 7-0-01992 alabama 8-0-01993 florida 7-1-01994 florida 7-1-01995 florida 8-0-01996 florida 8-0-01997 tennessee 7-1-01998 tennessee 8-0-01999 alabama 7-1-02000 florida 7-1-02001 lsu 5-3-02002 georgia 7-1-02003 lsu 7-1-02004 auburn (al) 8-0-02005 georgia 6-2-02006 florida 7-1-0just one question if the sec is so tough and every team in the sec (yes all 12) is great and overloaded with talent why in the last 16 years have only 6 out of the 12 great teams in the sec, have won the conference title? i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pit&atlfan81 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 southeastern conference champs last 16 years1990 tennessee 5-1-11991 florida 7-0-01992 alabama 8-0-01993 florida 7-1-01994 florida 7-1-01995 florida 8-0-01996 florida 8-0-01997 tennessee 7-1-01998 tennessee 8-0-01999 alabama 7-1-02000 florida 7-1-02001 lsu 5-3-02002 georgia 7-1-02003 lsu 7-1-02004 auburn (al) 8-0-02005 georgia 6-2-02006 florida 7-1-0just one question if the sec is so tough and every team in the sec (yes all 12) is great and overloaded with talent why in the last 16 years have only 6 out of the 12 great teams in the sec, have won the conference title? maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads?it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pit&atlfan81 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 southeastern conference champs last 16 years1990 tennessee 5-1-11991 florida 7-0-01992 alabama 8-0-01993 florida 7-1-01994 florida 7-1-01995 florida 8-0-01996 florida 8-0-01997 tennessee 7-1-01998 tennessee 8-0-01999 alabama 7-1-02000 florida 7-1-02001 lsu 5-3-02002 georgia 7-1-02003 lsu 7-1-02004 auburn (al) 8-0-02005 georgia 6-2-02006 florida 7-1-0just one question if the sec is so tough and every team in the sec (yes all 12) is great and overloaded with talent why in the last 16 years have only 6 out of the 12 great teams in the sec, have won the conference title? maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads?it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it. yeh, mr. dew i say you should find a bigten message board and talk about this stuff there for the record....one of my best friends is a die hard michigan fan. i mean he can tell you anything about the program from from the coaches to the waterboys. even he admits that the sec is an overall better conference. wake up mr. dew.......wake up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it. yeh, mr. dew i say you should find a bigten message board and talk about this stuff there for the record....one of my best friends is a die hard michigan fan. i mean he can tell you anything about the program from from the coaches to the waterboys. even he admits that the sec is an overall better conference. wake up mr. dew.......wake up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads?answers only, it is not polite to ask question when you have not answered the first question.but i will answer your question, becasue your fellow sec fans continue to bash the big ten with their opinnion. i am all for every mans opinnion that is what forums, message boards and blogs are for to let the world know your opinnion. but once you have let your opinnion be known let it go, but some continue the big ten is this the big ten is that the sec is this the sec is that. so i am here asking a question with factual statistic to back my question. not looking for an arguement or a big ten vs sec thread just a simple answer to the question that is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 i have a question for you? why do you keep making these threads?answers only, it is not polite to ask question when you have not answered the first question.but i will answer your question, becasue your fellow sec fans continue to bash the big ten with their opinnion. i am all for every mans opinnion that is what forums, message boards and blogs are for to let the world know your opinnion. but once you have let your opinnion be known let it go, but some continue the big ten is this the big ten is that the sec is this the sec is that. so i am here asking a question with factual statistic to back my question. not looking for an arguement or a big ten vs sec thread just a simple answer to the question that is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it.yes the sec does have more than 2 good teams, it has 6 good teams and 6 bad teams that not half bad at all.never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. yeh, mr. dew i say you should find a bigten message board and talk about this stuff there for the record....one of my best friends is a die hard michigan fan. i mean he can tell you anything about the program from from the coaches to the waterboys. even he admits that the sec is an overall better conference. wake up mr. dew.......wake up.sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 maybe b/c the sec actually has more then 2 good teams. it's called denial.he knows the sec is a far better conference then the big slow, but he can't bring himself to admit it.yes the sec does have more than 2 good teams, it has 6 good teams and 6 bad teams that not half bad at all.never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. yeh, mr. dew i say you should find a bigten message board and talk about this stuff there for the record....one of my best friends is a die hard michigan fan. i mean he can tell you anything about the program from from the coaches to the waterboys. even he admits that the sec is an overall better conference. wake up mr. dew.......wake up.sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 yes the sec does have more than 2 good teams, it has 6 good teams and 6 bad teams that not half bad at all.never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. first of all underneath the "question" you ask lies the truth. you are not just asking a question. you are coming to a message board that has a large sec fan base and you are trying to say that the sec is weaker than people think. i don't see a question in this thread at all. i just see an angry big ten fan that can't accept that another conference is better than his. either way, this is my last post ever in any of your threads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidWest Falcon Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 yes the sec does have more than 2 good teams, it has 6 good teams and 6 bad teams that not half bad at all.never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. first of all underneath the "question" you ask lies the truth. you are not just asking a question. you are coming to a message board that has a large sec fan base and you are trying to say that the sec is weaker than people think. i don't see a question in this thread at all. i just see an angry big ten fan that can't accept that another conference is better than his. either way, this is my last post ever in any of your threads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 first of all underneath the "question" you ask lies the truth. you are not just asking a question. you are coming to a message board that has a large sec fan base and you are trying to say that the sec is weaker than people think. i don't see a question in this thread at all. i just see an angry big ten fan that can't accept that another conference is better than his. either way, this is my last post ever in any of your threads question: why have only 6 teams won the sec conference title in the last 16 years? but thank you for exited stage left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 first of all underneath the "question" you ask lies the truth. you are not just asking a question. you are coming to a message board that has a large sec fan base and you are trying to say that the sec is weaker than people think. i don't see a question in this thread at all. i just see an angry big ten fan that can't accept that another conference is better than his. either way, this is my last post ever in any of your threads question: why have only 6 teams won the sec conference title in the last 16 years? but thank you for exited stage left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 question: why have only 6 teams won the sec conference title in the last 16 years? but thank you for exited stage left. what does that have to do with anything??so what that 6 different teams have won the title in the last 16 years??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 question: why have only 6 teams won the sec conference title in the last 16 years? but thank you for exited stage left. what does that have to do with anything??so what that 6 different teams have won the title in the last 16 years??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_i_f Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_i_f Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute.11 out of 12 bowl eligable if vandy wins 1 more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute.11 out of 12 bowl eligable if vandy wins 1 more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximusfalconus Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. everybody knows where you were going with this thread skippy. sir, give it a rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximusfalconus Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 never compared the sec to any other conference in this thread please stay on topic skippy. sir, in this thread i never compared the sec to the big ten, big 12, pac 10 or the acc. i simply ask a question, if you can not answer the question skip it and go to next question/ thread. if that is not enough for you please by all means add me to your ignore list and leave it at that. everybody knows where you were going with this thread skippy. sir, give it a rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 14, 2007 Author Share Posted November 14, 2007 what does that have to do with anything??so what that 6 different teams have won the title in the last 16 years???6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute.that is a very tough argument to refute and i am not trying to refute that argument. 6 out of 12 teams in the last 16 years means their are 6 team that are never in the race for the title. everybody knows where you were going with this thread skippy. sir, give it a rest. i understand i am not dealing with rocket scientist here but seriously you have yo be kidding me, if only 6 out of 12 teams in a 16 year span have won your conference title how can you claim that hands down all 12 of the team in the sec are dominant, you can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demetrius Dew Posted November 14, 2007 Author Share Posted November 14, 2007 what does that have to do with anything??so what that 6 different teams have won the title in the last 16 years???6 out of 16 is doing pretty well, by most people's standards...i know nebraska, miami, and usc each had good runs during that time, and they're all in different conferences, so there really isn't room for any one conference to have total dominance.when i go on about the sec being the best, i'm talking about how 9 of our teams were in the top 25 at some point this year, and only one of them has a losing record. it's a tough argument to refute.that is a very tough argument to refute and i am not trying to refute that argument. 6 out of 12 teams in the last 16 years means their are 6 team that are never in the race for the title. everybody knows where you were going with this thread skippy. sir, give it a rest. i understand i am not dealing with rocket scientist here but seriously you have yo be kidding me, if only 6 out of 12 teams in a 16 year span have won your conference title how can you claim that hands down all 12 of the team in the sec are dominant, you can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.