Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 how exactly do you figure lsu is the better team?? sorry i don't think lsu could move the ball on the buckeye d consistantly enough to win... all i see week in and week out is the osu offense getting better and better...i feel bad for all you sec jock sniffers if bc runs the table... i could only imagine how the media would be in a spin mode on how the mighty sec got snuffed from the championship game...talking about the nc game last yeargod it would feel good to play them without 51 days away from the football field!!!post after that onei will not use the 51 days as an excuse...but neither will i say that it was simple domination. if you had watched any of the buckeye games last year, and then watched that debacle at the end of the year...you would have noticed a team that just didn't show up. that was not the same team i watched all year. florida came out and did just what they needed to do to win...but the bucks didn't do anything to compete. troy did look like the guy i saw all year. ginn gets hurt on a stupid celebration, the o line, who never looked that bad...just looked confused and slow.mississippi st. , middle tennessee , tulane , louisiana tech , ole misswow...great schedule there!!! sure they play ranked teams...like florida...who is awfulhe conviently left off the fact that lsu has played five ranked teamsif he tries that leaping over defenders crap in the big 10 he's going to get himself killed.he's talking about sam mcguffie, it's not so much that i don't think he won't get killed but the fact that he says if he tries it in the big 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddawg77 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 hows this to show the true power of the secwho is stronger? the top 6 teams in the big east (wvu, uconn, usf, rutgers, cincy, louisville) or the sec east division (tennessee, florida, georgia, south carolina, kentucky, vanderbilt). kva: go by the standings. right now, on a neutral field, would you take & - connecticut vs. georgia & georgia- west virginia vs. tennessee & west virginia- rutgers vs. south carolina & south carolina (but i d call this even)- louisville vs. florida & florida- cincinnati vs. kentucky & kentucky- south florida vs. vanderbilt & south floridai d take the sec east, but remember, you re taking the worst team in a division vs. a mid-range team in a conference. make it syracuse vs. vandy and it s not even a close comparison. half the conf vs a whole other league!!and tennessee and vandy arent to far off from winning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddawg77 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 hows this to show the true power of the secwho is stronger? the top 6 teams in the big east (wvu, uconn, usf, rutgers, cincy, louisville) or the sec east division (tennessee, florida, georgia, south carolina, kentucky, vanderbilt). kva: go by the standings. right now, on a neutral field, would you take & - connecticut vs. georgia & georgia- west virginia vs. tennessee & west virginia- rutgers vs. south carolina & south carolina (but i d call this even)- louisville vs. florida & florida- cincinnati vs. kentucky & kentucky- south florida vs. vanderbilt & south floridai d take the sec east, but remember, you re taking the worst team in a division vs. a mid-range team in a conference. make it syracuse vs. vandy and it s not even a close comparison. half the conf vs a whole other league!!and tennessee and vandy arent to far off from winning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Same Ol Falcons Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 hows this to show the true power of the secwho is stronger? the top 6 teams in the big east (wvu, uconn, usf, rutgers, cincy, louisville) or the sec east division (tennessee, florida, georgia, south carolina, kentucky, vanderbilt). kva: go by the standings. right now, on a neutral field, would you take & - connecticut vs. georgia & georgia- west virginia vs. tennessee & west virginia- rutgers vs. south carolina & south carolina (but i d call this even)- louisville vs. florida & florida- cincinnati vs. kentucky & kentucky- south florida vs. vanderbilt & south floridai d take the sec east, but remember, you re taking the worst team in a division vs. a mid-range team in a conference. make it syracuse vs. vandy and it s not even a close comparison. half the conf vs a whole other league!!and tennessee and vandy arent to far off from winning.you did all that for the wrong conference - he said the big 10 not the big east Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Same Ol Falcons Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 hows this to show the true power of the secwho is stronger? the top 6 teams in the big east (wvu, uconn, usf, rutgers, cincy, louisville) or the sec east division (tennessee, florida, georgia, south carolina, kentucky, vanderbilt). kva: go by the standings. right now, on a neutral field, would you take & - connecticut vs. georgia & georgia- west virginia vs. tennessee & west virginia- rutgers vs. south carolina & south carolina (but i d call this even)- louisville vs. florida & florida- cincinnati vs. kentucky & kentucky- south florida vs. vanderbilt & south floridai d take the sec east, but remember, you re taking the worst team in a division vs. a mid-range team in a conference. make it syracuse vs. vandy and it s not even a close comparison. half the conf vs a whole other league!!and tennessee and vandy arent to far off from winning.you did all that for the wrong conference - he said the big 10 not the big east Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SacFalcFan Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 can i just end this thread. the answer is heck yes!! okay then.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SacFalcFan Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 can i just end this thread. the answer is heck yes!! okay then.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_i_f Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 no. most are, if you can fathom it, even more twisted. don't believe me? michigan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_i_f Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 no. most are, if you can fathom it, even more twisted. don't believe me? michigan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 no. most are, if you can fathom it, even more twisted. don't believe me? michigan.i was reading a michigan board that still thought they had nc hopes after app st. beat them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 no. most are, if you can fathom it, even more twisted. don't believe me? michigan.i was reading a michigan board that still thought they had nc hopes after app st. beat them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 my friend that goes to michigan was trying to convince me the other day that michael hart is better than mcfadden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 my friend that goes to michigan was trying to convince me the other day that michael hart is better than mcfadden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 my friend that goes to michigan was trying to convince me the other day that michael hart is better than mcfadden. don't get me wrong mike hart is good but is not on or near mcfadden's level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 my friend that goes to michigan was trying to convince me the other day that michael hart is better than mcfadden. don't get me wrong mike hart is good but is not on or near mcfadden's level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 don't get me wrong mike hart is good but is not on or near mcfadden's level.he also was trying to tell me that michigan has a better history than any school in the sec.that was pretty funny too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 don't get me wrong mike hart is good but is not on or near mcfadden's level.he also was trying to tell me that michigan has a better history than any school in the sec.that was pretty funny too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 he also was trying to tell me that michigan has a better history than any school in the sec.that was pretty funny too.was his name demetrius dew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 he also was trying to tell me that michigan has a better history than any school in the sec.that was pretty funny too.was his name demetrius dew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 was his name demetrius dew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdu00743 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 was his name demetrius dew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 not funny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethanga62890 Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 not funny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 michigan has won about 75% of their games and has played something like 1200 games....thats a helluva traditionof course a large part of that for probably about 90% of the big 10's history, its a two horse race between michigan and ohio state. there is just rarely any real depth in that conference and big 10 teams play creampuff ooc schedules other than notre dame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 michigan has won about 75% of their games and has played something like 1200 games....thats a helluva traditionof course a large part of that for probably about 90% of the big 10's history, its a two horse race between michigan and ohio state. there is just rarely any real depth in that conference and big 10 teams play creampuff ooc schedules other than notre dame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.