bow chicka wow wow Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 receiving leaders rnk name rec yds avg ypg lng td fum lst 1 randy moss wr, nwe 44 732 16.6 104.6 51 10 0 0 2 chad johnson wr, cin 39 680 17.4 113.3 56 3 0 0 3 l. fitzgerald wr, ari 46 642 14.0 91.7 43 1 3 3 4 terrell owens wr, dal 34 556 16.4 79.4 47 5 0 0 5 b. edwards wr, cle 29 552 19.0 92.0 78 7 1 1 6 p. burress wr, nyg 35 550 15.7 78.6 60 8 0 0 7 t. houshmandzadeh wr, cin 51 548 10.7 91.3 42 8 1 1 8 antonio gates te, sdg 43 547 12.7 91.2 34 3 0 0 9 j. cotchery wr, nyj 41 545 13.3 77.9 50 1 0 0 10 jason witten te, dal 42 540 12.9 77.1 38 4 0 0 11 roddy white wr, atl 33 530 16.1 75.7 69 2 1 0 i dont count the te as wr so hes the #9 wr in yards now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax-Falcon Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 very nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vagus_x Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 roddy is playing great this year but we are still 1-6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SINIK4L Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 roddy is playing great this year but we are still 1-6 we have kool aid and no sugar, we have peanut butter and no jelly, and we have ham and no burger.i wish our team could put it all together one season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamill Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 we have kool aid and no sugar, we have peanut butter and no jelly, and we have ham and no burger.i wish our team could put it all together one season.it would rule if he got to the pro bowl. probably not enough tds though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonfalcon Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 it would rule if he got to the pro bowl. probably not enough tds though.over half the players are afc and 1 te so he could well be in the running for the pro bowl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonfalcon Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 a falcon's wr in the pro-bowl? is it snowing in ****?brrrrrr!!! yeah baby!!roddy is in 4th place of nfc wr, and only 10 yards behind burress and 16 yards behind owens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aug_falcon Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 should be higher if they could've moved the ball better in weeks 5 and 6. bout time we get a potential 1000 yard reciever since mathis! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newtone Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 receiving leaders rnk name rec yds avg ypg lng td fum lst 1 randy moss wr, nwe 44 732 16.6 104.6 51 10 0 0 2 chad johnson wr, cin 39 680 17.4 113.3 56 3 0 0 3 l. fitzgerald wr, ari 46 642 14.0 91.7 43 1 3 3 4 terrell owens wr, dal 34 556 16.4 79.4 47 5 0 0 5 b. edwards wr, cle 29 552 19.0 92.0 78 7 1 1 6 p. burress wr, nyg 35 550 15.7 78.6 60 8 0 0 7 t. houshmandzadeh wr, cin 51 548 10.7 91.3 42 8 1 1 8 antonio gates te, sdg 43 547 12.7 91.2 34 3 0 0 9 j. cotchery wr, nyj 41 545 13.3 77.9 50 1 0 0 10 jason witten te, dal 42 540 12.9 77.1 38 4 0 0 11 roddy white wr, atl 33 530 16.1 75.7 69 2 1 0 i dont count the te as wr so hes the #9 wr in yards nowso? the surprise is us sitting at 1-6 and being one of the worst offensives in the league. we have to pass the ball because we can't run his numbers better increase. i liked it better when we ran the ball better than anyone and won a few games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesouphead Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 he finally started using his size and strengthto his advantage this season. it has gotten him in trouble a couple time(holding calls), but overall, it has made him a much better wr. thank hue??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenfl Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 good for atl and roddy. only a few problems. 1. many teams havent had their bye yet so the ones that havent obviously have an unfair advantage if you try to compare their stats.2. every other receiver that had success last year on atl has totally fallen off. what good is better play from 1 player when multiple players have declined quite a bit?3. im not sure when #11 became top 10. maybe someone can inform me on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilkin Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 receiving leaders rnk name rec yds avg ypg lng td fum lst 1 randy moss wr, nwe 44 732 16.6 104.6 51 10 0 0 2 chad johnson wr, cin 39 680 17.4 113.3 56 3 0 0 3 l. fitzgerald wr, ari 46 642 14.0 91.7 43 1 3 3 4 terrell owens wr, dal 34 556 16.4 79.4 47 5 0 0 5 b. edwards wr, cle 29 552 19.0 92.0 78 7 1 1 6 p. burress wr, nyg 35 550 15.7 78.6 60 8 0 0 7 t. houshmandzadeh wr, cin 51 548 10.7 91.3 42 8 1 1 8 antonio gates te, sdg 43 547 12.7 91.2 34 3 0 0 9 j. cotchery wr, nyj 41 545 13.3 77.9 50 1 0 0 10 jason witten te, dal 42 540 12.9 77.1 38 4 0 0 11 roddy white wr, atl 33 530 16.1 75.7 69 2 1 0 i dont count the te as wr so hes the #9 wr in yards nowthe category is receiving yards, not wide receiver yards vick was always listed with rb's, did that count? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headshot Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 good for atl and roddy. only a few problems. 1. many teams havent had their bye yet so the ones that havent obviously have an unfair advantage if you try to compare their stats.2. every other receiver that had success last year on atl has totally fallen off. what good is better play from 1 player when multiple players have declined quite a bit?3. im not sure when #11 became top 10. maybe someone can inform me on that.because antonio gates is not a wide receiver, and i think that's what the op was referring to when he said "i'm not counting the te as a wr." i mean, he might as well be because he plays in the slot or out wide more than he does on the line, but they list him as a tight end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickelplated38 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 because antonio gates is not a wide receiver, and i think that's what the op was referring to when he said "i'm not counting the te as a wr." i mean, he might as well be because he plays in the slot or out wide more than he does on the line, but they list him as a tight end.dallas clark is in the same category...that's just like when the bucs used to call alstott a fb and used him as a td vulture... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenfl Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 because antonio gates is not a wide receiver, and i think that's what the op was referring to when he said "i'm not counting the te as a wr." i mean, he might as well be because he plays in the slot or out wide more than he does on the line, but they list him as a tight end.ty gates will probably play a more traditional te now that they have chambers but i like to compare stats when every team in the nfl has played the same amount of games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SacFalcFan Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 great to see roddy making plays for us. i hope he keeps it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonSen88 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 good for atl and roddy. only a few problems. 1. many teams havent had their bye yet so the ones that havent obviously have an unfair advantage if you try to compare their stats.2. every other receiver that had success last year on atl has totally fallen off. what good is better play from 1 player when multiple players have declined quite a bit?3. im not sure when #11 became top 10. maybe someone can inform me on that.1. roddy has the fewest receptions of every player in the top 10 and the 3rd fewest of everyone in the top 20.2. alge crumpler is the only exception. jenkins is on pace to break his career seasonal total in yards and receptions.3. he mentioned only wrs, and witten/gates are tight ends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird backer Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 what gets me is all the idiots out there still dissing our receivers. both white & jenkins have made tremendous strides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenfl Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 what gets me is all the idiots out there still dissing our receivers. both white & jenkins have made tremendous stridesjenkins was the td threat for atl he no longer is and he has probably dropped as many passes this year as he did last year. white is 100x better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durrans Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 receiving leaders rnk name rec yds avg ypg lng td fum lst 1 randy moss wr, nwe 44 732 16.6 104.6 51 10 0 0 2 chad johnson wr, cin 39 680 17.4 113.3 56 3 0 0 3 l. fitzgerald wr, ari 46 642 14.0 91.7 43 1 3 3 4 terrell owens wr, dal 34 556 16.4 79.4 47 5 0 0 5 b. edwards wr, cle 29 552 19.0 92.0 78 7 1 1 6 p. burress wr, nyg 35 550 15.7 78.6 60 8 0 0 7 t. houshmandzadeh wr, cin 51 548 10.7 91.3 42 8 1 1 8 antonio gates te, sdg 43 547 12.7 91.2 34 3 0 0 9 j. cotchery wr, nyj 41 545 13.3 77.9 50 1 0 0 10 jason witten te, dal 42 540 12.9 77.1 38 4 0 0 11 roddy white wr, atl 33 530 16.1 75.7 69 2 1 0 i dont count the te as wr so hes the #9 wr in yards nowi told everyone he was going to be. roddy is the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.