Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'bpa vs need'.
Found 1 result
So this season looks to be coming to an end, halfway through the season. As of right now we are slotted for the 4th pick (this may be different depending on SOS). And while a 4th overall pick sounds great, the Falcons inevitability win a few games at the end of the season, so that probably will change. Let me premise this next part that I’m not solely advocating any drafting methodology. I think that both have their merits based on mitigating circumstances. I’m leaning these questions towards the advocates of only one type of methodology. I also realize that that the draft is always a crap shoot. I’ve devised a few fun scenarios for each side to debate, but feel free to chime in regardless of where you stand. Remember this is for fun. So now for my hypothetical scenarios for each group: BPA: The top pass rushing prospect is off the board. 1) Consensus rankings have Jerry Jeudy as the BPA at our pick. Do we select him? 2) Consensus rankings have Tua Tagovailoa as the BPA at our pick. Do we select him? Need: The top prospect at positions of need are off the board. Remaining top tier prospects are at skill positions. 1) If the drop off in talent is considerable at positions of need? Do we select the skill positions? 2) What level of talent disparity are you willingly to trade off for a need?