Jump to content

federicofalcon2

Forum Members
  • Content Count

    1,420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About federicofalcon2

  • Rank
    Starting Lineup
  • Birthday 10/03/1982

Recent Profile Visitors

1,985 profile views
  1. I still want to see what we have with KB. He showed real promise and it would be nice to have him ready to go once Matt is done. Plus he’s only 25
  2. Agreed. Scheming a player open was key in 2015-2018. Matt might have all day to throw but nobody was getting open and the playcalling was so horrid the defense never had to feel threatened of a running game. We passed so much because Koetter couldn’t plan a game to save his life that included ANY run game. The only times our team did well was when the defense was outperforming (Raiders) or the offense found the rhythm to throw at ease (Vikings come to mind, might be wrong). But we never saw the group talent in cohesion for any real stretch. In 2016 we had Julio, Matt, and Freeman/Coleman play
  3. sorry, that to me is kind of the same thing. people are clamoring for going all in on him because Lawrence wont be available, so I was just curious for someone whose stock rose dramatically these past few months, and mainly because he beat clemson to get to the championship, if he was to bomb in the most important game of his life, would they not see him the same way they have leading up to the draft and lower his draft stock in place of someone else. I see a lot of people have had Wilson's draft rise up as well because they feel Fields and Lawrence will be gone 1-2.
  4. heres a question. If he leaves, traded or otherwise, how long do you think before anyone ever wears 11 again? hopefully never, but never know...
  5. So his good game against Clemson raised his stock value but a bad game in the championship wont drop it? sounds legit...
  6. I agree, being able to trade back down, ride with Matt for another year, pick up another 1st next year while getting more picks this year will help us fill holes. The cap is a factor this year because of the COVID keeping fans out of games, but I could see us earning back more of that the following year with an even bigger increase in SC for the whole league once they get fans back to games. Having 2 picks next year would allow us to draft someone in next years draft while not having to eat a huge amount of cap space for Matt and once the 2022 season is done we should have his replacem
  7. I just think so much is riding on this pick and spending it on him could possibly blow up in our face because he was pretty inconsistent throughout college. Not saying he is a bad player, but id be worried that his stock rose quickly before the draft, and he might be the second best qb in this draft but Im also hearing there is a huge drop off from Lawrence to anyone else.
  8. I think that's kind of what I was getting at. His stock rose dramatically this past month with Lawrence possibly going 1 overall, and now we have 4, people are hoping that we take him. I was just wondering because he hasnt been a model of consistency throughout his college career and he has had some good games, but he has also had some bad ones as well. I'm just curious is if he were to play a terrible game next, would people still feel he should go that high in similar fashion how Lawrence's stock hasnt dropped. Or would it be maybe he was projected too high too soon?
  9. what if Fields blows dog in the championship game? Does that change anyone's opinion of him then?
  10. not necessarily true. when Burrow went down Herbert played 9 games at that point, so over the first ten games of each Herbert out did Burrow in yards (3015 to 2688) tds (23 to 13), only 2 more picks and same amount of wins.
  11. I’m not familiar with too many college players, but improving the line is key especially if we are trying to stick with a WCO. Ryan upright and running back holes are important for success of this team Thay said, I don’t like the idea of getting rid of Matthews or McGary. Because if we look at the style of offense that is being called, Koetter is not utilizing them correctly. Matthews is a very good LT, playing in that 2016 style fast paced offense. Kaleb is coming into his own and should only get better if he isn’t having to pass block 70% of the time on 7-10 step drops. We ar
  12. I think when you consider trades like this, how many ever really work out trading up with a bounty of picks? Our Julio trade is one of a very few that have actually showed one sided victory for the loss of massive picks. And rarely do you see both sides getting a positive return. RG3, Wentz, and even Mike Vick are a few where it’s very questionable about whether the bounty was worth the return. I’m sure there are others, but the amount we’d have to give up coinciding with all the holes we’ll have to fill with draft picks next year, seems irresponsible to give up for someone who isn’t
  13. His current oLine would work great if he was running the scheme from 2015-2018. Koetter makes him stand in the pocket for ages. Look at Brees. He is a high efficiency passer because he moves the ball with quick short to medium throws mixed in with a above average running game opening up for big plays downfield. Ryan isn’t getting any younger. But he’s still a great player. Give him the offense Sark and Shanny were running along with this defense improving and I’m pretty sure we’ll see rings.
  14. My issue with my tanking or best possible player is this....if the team wants someone, and want them BAD ENOUGH, they’ll get them. Look at Julio, all the capital we gave up to get him. It’s not impossible to think we could t possibly trade up if opportunity comes. Especially since it’s likely top three picks could be qbs. And we traded up from mid 20s to 6. We gave up a lot but they did what they needed to get who they wanted. so because there is always a chance we can move around, especially with a new regime coming in, let’s hope for the best and if they win ANY of these next games
×
×
  • Create New...