Jump to content

Free Radical

Pure Football
  • Content Count

    10,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Free Radical

  1. 42 minutes ago, Dago 3.0 said:

    while I am no fan of WFW, he has a point

    why would people talk about the need to assure education, healthcare, food, and housing and not safety? why would those others be more important?

    Safety is a relative term. If I have the right to safety, then statistically we should ban all firearms before we worry about possible immigrants being terrorists. 

  2. 45 minutes ago, gazoo said:

    The big lie is those people were always covered for healthcare whether or not they had insurance. We have free clinics and Grady hospitals for the poor, they were always covered. 

    Problem is, now those middle class families who have worked hard all their lives are making less money and their helsthcare costs way more with sky high deductibles now they cannot afford to use theirs, while many who refuse to work can get free care anytime. 

    There were plenty of other ways to address healthcare problems without destroying the whole system for the middle class. My dedicatble went up to $7000 from $2500 and my premiums up 25% and it covers a lot less tha. Before. There were other ways without screwing the middle class.

    It treated medical emergencies, but any kind of ongoing treatment they needed, they were screwed. Pre-existing conditions? Screwed. Republicans fought against closing the medicaid gap, and I know people who were personally affected by that in Georgia and Tennessee.

  3. 1 hour ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

    Doesn't this sound familiar?  The dems say it is a problem and that they're the only ones who can solve it.  I agree they are ironic.  

    And Repubs deny it's a problem and refuse to do anything that would even improve common sense issues like pollution. 

    We threw billions in subsidies to the oil industries over the decades, and drove electric vehicles out of business decades ago with legal manipulation. Reagan removed solar panels from the White House and fought against solar tax credits? Why. What was the purpose. It only caused more harm. It's rah-rah ******** like that that is the problem. 

  4. 1 hour ago, pzummo said:

    Anybody else see the irony in this? We call it "Man Made Global Warming". It's actually man's practice of science that causes the emissions. So "scientists" blame "man" when it's actually the advancements of science that have caused the emissions.

    And now science is supposed to be trusted. Man is the problem while science is our "savior". The Earth and man lived just fine together for thousands of years before science advanced to the point of world destruction. 

    I don't hate science. Just saying. It's pretty ironic if you really think about it. Sorry to bring religion into this, but the irony is identical. Atheists are like, "I believe in science, how many people were killed in the name of God?" Umm, how many people were killed in the name of science? Atom bombs, assault weapons, chemical and biological warfare, the list goes on.

    Everyone has to see the irony here, regardless of which side of any of the debates you're on.

    Science is just a tool. What society does with it lays with them. 

  5. 7 minutes ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

    So they're insured now, what good is it if people cannot afford to use it?  That's like kissing your sister.  They should have taken the 15% that did not have or could not afford insurance and put them on medicaid instead of fuggin' up the entire system for everyone else.  

    Part of the PPACA was to expand Medicaid to cover people up to 138% of the national poverty level, it's just that several stupid redneck states instead opted out of the medicaid expansion program as a political maneuver to try and tank the program, showing once again that right wing nuts are willing to sacrifice lives in order to win their political games. 

  6. 1 hour ago, gazoo said:

    Jonathan Gruber, one of Obamas architects of the bill, was caught on tape ridiculing the useful idiots who believed the flagrant lies Obama was peddling  to pass the bill. He was not mocking you or me becuase we saw through the lies, he was mocking people like free radickal who to this day drinks the kool aid. 

    We had Ben Rhodes, Obamas spokesman for the Iran deal mocking the useful idiots who believed the lies they were telling to get that deal done. Rhodes was not mocking you or me, he was mocking peop,e like free radickal who believe that lies and still defend them.

    it is simply amazing the leftist ideology supports lying and deceit. We know they lie because if they told the truth there's no way the public would support Obamacare, Cap and Trade, a borderless country, free flow illegal immigration  and a host of other progressive policies. 

    Usefull idiots, plenty of them.

    Uninsured rates at an all time low. You mad bro?

  7. 1 hour ago, dirtyhairy said:

    Ah, Rad. Obama took out Osama? You mean our intelligence agencys, SEAL Team 6 and countless War hours in the desert is what you meant to say. Osama gave a green light to an operation. That does not mean He Did anything other then got out of the way.

    The economy. Unemployment is over 11% with over 95 million people not working. Wages are way down from 15 years ago. Disability and welfare are through the roof. Our economic growth is the slowest since WW2 and every economic indicator other then Wall street is in the toilet. Why is wall street up? Because this idiot gives them $80 billion per MONTH, for the last 7.5 years. This idiot has also doubled the national debt, saw our credit rating get tanked and at $20 trillion in debt, we cannot see the end for 100 years.

    There's also our tanked reputation in the world. The chinese hack us, the North Koreans laugh at us and the Russians punk our Navy with fly by's. The middle east is an absolute disaster and all sectors of our planet are on fire.

    So blah blah blah, Obama took our Osama. Just like you trumpeted Bush taking out Hussein. 

    Unemployment is under 5%:

    720px-US_Employment_Statistics.svg.png

    Not a single state in the country has an unemployment percentage of 11%. More lies from the snake.

    Wage rate is climbing back up, which is the exact opposite from the Bush recession, where it tanked starting in 2007. 

    No President has been responsible for increasing debt more than Bush, who increased debt at a higher rate than any President in history. 

    Obama has improved our relations with the rest of the world, and has only been stuck with the disaster in the Middle East Bush left behind.

    Typical neo-con doesn't take responsibility for their actions, nor can that be anything other than pathological liars. 

  8. On 5/20/2016 at 2:34 PM, dirtyhairy said:

    Ah, Radical. Could you please share a link where anyone said there was a mini ice age in the 70's. I will wait right here.....Oh rad. rad, rad.....Hmm, I guess you've gone down for your noon time nap.

    You do realize that it's not possible for me to respond to your nonsense while you're in the process of typing it, right? Do you need me to explain to you how the Internet works? 

  9. On 5/20/2016 at 1:38 PM, gazoo said:

    The raw data shows virtually no warming over the last 20 years, they had to manipulate the data in order to claim it did not cool.

    Again, straight up lie.

    IPCC AR5 Figure 1.4.  Solid lines and squares represent measured average global surface temperature changes by NASA (blue), NOAA (yellow), and the  UK Hadley Centre (green).  The colored shading shows the projected range of surface warming in the IPCC First Assessment Report (FAR; yellow), Second (SAR; green), Third (TAR; blue), and Fourth (AR4; red).

     

    The Earth has been warming within the predictive models presented in the 90s. By arbitrarily choosing the start data as 98, the single hottest year on recorded that far exceeded other measurements do to one of the strongest El Nino events in the 20th century, it is easy to manipulate the picture to look like it isn't warming as much. The long term trend is warming, and picking short slices from a couple of years in an attempt to claim it's cooling is just proof of how desperate they are to continue such a narrative. 

  10. 23 hours ago, dmo_dlo said:

     

    Oh WFW and Gazoo even provided irrefutable proof of the ice age claims in the 70s.

    It's bogus. The peer reviewed literature at the time was more or less unanimous in saying the Earth was warming. The few claims of cooling were blaming a potential mass increase in aerosol concentrations in the atmosphere. 

    1970s_papers.gif

     

    It wasn't until the clean air acts started passing in countries around the world, including our own, that aerosol started massively declining.

    Again, ******** narrative designed to paint doctoral research by people who have dedicated their lives to studying the climate as alarmist fools. 

  11. You can always point out the simple minded sheep conservatives as soon as they make a tired "hurr durr Al Gore thinks he invented the Internet" comment. 

    It's literally a scientifically illiterate circle jerk in here. It's amusing to watch them bounce between there isn't warming, there's cooling, actually nothing is changing at all, but even if it is it's not a big deal, but nothing is happening, to no it's really cooling. 

     

     

  12. Only a boom if you're functionally ********. 

    It sets the baseline at the hottest period on record, including the current record holder 98 as the starting point. 

    The equivalent of saying you're "driving slow" when you're going 110 because you comparing it to when you were going 120 just a few minutes ago. 

    Really, it's simple. If you don't believe in climate change its because you're either ignorant or a hack.

  13. 3 hours ago, Flip Flop said:

    From when do you determine the norm?  It seems to me that the global temperature is constantly on a path between very cold and very hot.  According to history, it seems logical that we should be headed to a high point.

    6a010536b58035970c01b8d1876850970c-pi

    I have as many qualifications as Cliff Harris and Randy Mann in climatology and meteorology. This chart is literally based on made-up information Harris supposedly from the Bible that has no real data to back it up, that doesn't follow any other known source of temperature records, and only goes back 4500 years because he's a YEC. To top it off, the chart is based around the arbitrary number of 57.1 degrees without a consistent scaling of temperatures throughout the graph. The dude is a loony-toon chemtrail nut who thinks there a global conspiracy to control the weather, and has been caught several times blatantly lying about what people have said to further his own agenda.

×
×
  • Create New...