Jump to content


Forum Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JBender

  1. Could you guys cry about something else? Someone comes in here and just says bye and you guys jump all over it! I mean why not just let it go like an adult instead of coming into the post and assuming your keyboard commander roles? Maybe you have so many posts because you don't have a life outside of a message board.
  2. My God has everyone on here forgot about Clowney? Chase maybe no different!
  3. The problem here is that the Big 12 is notorious for not having defenses. I won't rule it out but lets see how he does when he has to play some of the Nations top defenses.
  4. Because we know next year said PRODUCTIVE asset won't be here. The Giants are not giving up a second anyway so it doesn't matter.
  5. Tom Benson their owner who passed.
  6. The call was bad and I haven't seen anyone say otherwise. There were several bad calls in that game. My point is that two fold. One, There were bad calls on both teams and you can argue both cost the respective team the game. Not to mention the Saint's have the beneficiary of favorable calls more than any other team I have seen play. Second, The whole conspiracy theory thing shows insanity. Instead of accepting the fact that you got a bad call as well as the Rams did it has to be someone else's fault. The game went to OT. The Saints got the ball and had a chance to end it without the Ram's eve
  7. Had the refs not missed the face mask call on Geoff then it wouldn't have mattered anyway. The Rams would have had 1st and goal on the 2. We can debate all day on "what if's" but it doesn't matter. The call was bad we all know it. My question is how many times did the Saints yell conspiracy when they got a favorable call? Never heard a Saints fan yell the game was fixed we committed a PI call that would have given the Falcons a game, It must have been a conspiracy! If they think the League is fixed then they also have to acknowledge that they have been the beneficiary of that fix
  8. One of the things that bugs me about Beasley's stats is the year he had 15 sacks and lead the league in sacks 4 of those stats came from him lining up on a guy that was literally brought in of the street. I forgot the team we were playing at the time but I remember the situation. Every time I see his stats I think about those 4 sacks and have since he was the sack leader last year. If you consider that those 4 sacks were against someone with sub par talent for the NFL then do you really consider the sacks up to par? Don't get me wrong a sack is a sack and the numbers are the numbers but just s
  9. If you want to look at it that way then I ask "who won a Superbowl?" With that being said there is a difference between a player with talent and a coach. Yes Marino is better than Dilfer. However I must ask what the goal is here. Do we want 3 seasons with a super bowl win among them or do we want 3 seasons going to the playoffs every year with out a Superbowl? I am not saying Smitty is better than DQ. I am saying neither of them have a Superbowl win so neither of them are better than the other. If DQ wins a Superbowl then DQ is better.
  10. The only thing I see here is neither one of them won a Super Bowl, so neither of them are better than the other. Getting into the playoffs is nice and all but what is getting to the payoffs with out winning the big one. It is a moot point.
  11. Just ran in to Author Blank in the airport and he confirmed this. We are about to get shellfish!
  12. OK so, I think some of you guys are mischaracterizing someone who does not want the Falcons to win anymore this season. First off I have no opinion either way but looking at it from a logical perspective then they have a more valid point. If you look at it in terms of value then the team losing provides a higher draft position, creating value. If they win however you lose that draft pick value. There is a point in wanting your team to win but at this point what do you really win? You may achieve a warm and fuzzy feeling for a day or so but that will cost the team in April. Is it worth it? That
  13. Truth is you don't need data to see that Sark is way over his head. You see it with your own eyes every game day.
  14. He knows we are not going to the playoffs! He is just trying to troll.
  15. Ok, So i don't think Beasley is a bust but lets be real about his 2016 season. He lined up against a guy off the street and got 4 or 5 sacks in one game. Basically the same as Clayborn did last year. Again i am not saying he is a bust but he had some very favorable match ups the year he lead the league in sacks.
  16. Nope, but I can blame them for not getting off the field on 3rd down.
  17. The D is still bad. They couldn't get off the field.They gashed them with the run all day and Laundry got hit 6 TIMES before he went down. Piss poor effort on the D.I mean Miami has the worst Offense in the league and our D made them look like the patriots in the second half of the SB. Don't give me they were tired crap. Get off the field!
  18. Ladies and gentlemen we have an internet tough guy here! I must have struck a nerve with you bro to get you all worked up like this and I like it! I am not going to argue with you though because it is pointless. Oh and adults like myself know how to spell "be quiet" and "when". I got you so heated you couldn't even spell! LMAO!
  19. Look I am willing to to give Tru a pass on this because of the time it has been since his last game snaps were played. However you like a lot of other posters on here seem to be able to ignore the obvious. He had a bad game! I have bad days as I am sure we all do but my friends don't go around telling everyone I am on my "A" game when I am not because they know they would just look stupid if they did.
  20. For one because they were playing zone and Glennon was passing underneath like you should but underneath is the responsibility of the LBs and like I said kudos to them for making the plays.Even that deep pass to the end zone for their RB (Forgot his name but the rookie) Campbell had him in coverage.
  21. I really don't get some of you guys. The OP is correct that was not a great showing by the D. I think the statement should have been more specific so some of you couldn't come in and spin it. The statement should have been the secondary was horrendous. The front 7 played well for the most part and should be credited for doing so. Now the secondary on the other hand well that is another story. I will even give them a break on that last drive because we all knew DQ was going to play C3 and let everything underneath go and gamble inside the 10. Alford is never going to learn, he is a holding
  • Create New...