Jump to content

JBender

Forum Members
  • Content Count

    858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About JBender

  • Rank
    Roster Player

Recent Profile Visitors

3,211 profile views
  1. Could you guys cry about something else? Someone comes in here and just says bye and you guys jump all over it! I mean why not just let it go like an adult instead of coming into the post and assuming your keyboard commander roles? Maybe you have so many posts because you don't have a life outside of a message board.
  2. My God has everyone on here forgot about Clowney? Chase maybe no different!
  3. The problem here is that the Big 12 is notorious for not having defenses. I won't rule it out but lets see how he does when he has to play some of the Nations top defenses.
  4. Because we know next year said PRODUCTIVE asset won't be here. The Giants are not giving up a second anyway so it doesn't matter.
  5. Tom Benson their owner who passed.
  6. The call was bad and I haven't seen anyone say otherwise. There were several bad calls in that game. My point is that two fold. One, There were bad calls on both teams and you can argue both cost the respective team the game. Not to mention the Saint's have the beneficiary of favorable calls more than any other team I have seen play. Second, The whole conspiracy theory thing shows insanity. Instead of accepting the fact that you got a bad call as well as the Rams did it has to be someone else's fault. The game went to OT. The Saints got the ball and had a chance to end it without the Ram's eve
  7. Had the refs not missed the face mask call on Geoff then it wouldn't have mattered anyway. The Rams would have had 1st and goal on the 2. We can debate all day on "what if's" but it doesn't matter. The call was bad we all know it. My question is how many times did the Saints yell conspiracy when they got a favorable call? Never heard a Saints fan yell the game was fixed we committed a PI call that would have given the Falcons a game, It must have been a conspiracy! If they think the League is fixed then they also have to acknowledge that they have been the beneficiary of that fix
  8. One of the things that bugs me about Beasley's stats is the year he had 15 sacks and lead the league in sacks 4 of those stats came from him lining up on a guy that was literally brought in of the street. I forgot the team we were playing at the time but I remember the situation. Every time I see his stats I think about those 4 sacks and have since he was the sack leader last year. If you consider that those 4 sacks were against someone with sub par talent for the NFL then do you really consider the sacks up to par? Don't get me wrong a sack is a sack and the numbers are the numbers but just s
  9. If you want to look at it that way then I ask "who won a Superbowl?" With that being said there is a difference between a player with talent and a coach. Yes Marino is better than Dilfer. However I must ask what the goal is here. Do we want 3 seasons with a super bowl win among them or do we want 3 seasons going to the playoffs every year with out a Superbowl? I am not saying Smitty is better than DQ. I am saying neither of them have a Superbowl win so neither of them are better than the other. If DQ wins a Superbowl then DQ is better.
  10. The only thing I see here is neither one of them won a Super Bowl, so neither of them are better than the other. Getting into the playoffs is nice and all but what is getting to the payoffs with out winning the big one. It is a moot point.
  11. Just ran in to Author Blank in the airport and he confirmed this. We are about to get shellfish!
×
×
  • Create New...