Jump to content


Pure Football
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About ATLFalcons11

  • Rank
    Veteran Falcon
  • Birthday 11/20/1986

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. To me a 1st rounder is a 1st rounder. Now vs later only makes you FEEL better. The only variables that REALLY matter when discussing 2022 1st rounder vs 2023 1st rounder is - What team do we get the 1st rounder from? - Did the team have a better or worse record between 2022 and 2023? - What players are coming out? (Always a variable) If we're thinking we can leverage that 1st rounder for a future QB, then 2023 may actually be more valuable than 2022. There's not a lot of love for the next drafts QBs right now. It could always change, but I think that's my point.
  2. The way I read that and admittedly this could be projecting, but I'm thinking if it's a first round pick, then it's most likely a 2023 1st rounder instead of a 2022. That's not to say other compensation wouldn't come with it like a 2022 5th rounder or something of that nature. But for first round I'm think 2 years from now.
  3. Bruh you haven't learned from the draft that they don't show their cards. All this "TF hasn't shot down the idea" isn't any indication at all that there is or isn't "fire behind the smoke."
  4. Agreed. With Mayfield never playing Guard before I think he will more than likely need a year. That leaves Gono in the lead for that spot me thinks.
  5. Yea that's exactly why. Deflee one of the best looking girls that's ever been on the show.
  6. She's from the Real World and also has been on MTV's the Challenge and she won one of the seasons she was on as well. She's pregnant right now too.
  7. That's what I'm saying. The 4th round will tell the story for DL, meaning what they think vs what we think isn't complete yet. If they pick one or more up in the 4th, then I'd say they do think the same about the DL as we do.
  8. I was just saying this to my brothers during the first round about RB. I think the team is comfortable with the RB position, namely Davis and Cordarelle. I can see us not picking one up until UDFA. For DL I think this 4th round may tell the story.
  9. I'm not saying we don't. Although I've seen the worst of teams take a turn after a culture change. The big thing still remains that a lot of ppl are mocking off of need. IF, big if, we believe TF, then the convo really should be who's the bpa at 9, 35, 40, etc. More difficult to determine admittedly once you get past the first two rounds
  10. Interesting take. My only issue with the conversation so far is that people are still mocking off of need it seems. It's either you don't believe TF when he says truly BPA, you haven't adapted your mind to it, or you truly think the need is also the bpa. I see the word "need" a lot in this thread. The above is wild to me because we don't need a TE, but everybody seemingly is on the Pitts train. So it's like bpa if we stay put at 4 and need based if we trade back. I don't think a trade back changes the approach of TF.
  11. Well I hear you on that. I said a couple of weeks back, of the main options there's probably no wrong move. It's all a matter of preference at this point. There's data, examples, etc. of every angle discussed on here.
  12. I understand what you're saying but simply put you're leaving out two very important things. 1. Value of the pick 2. The power of "If"
  13. Perfect! No argument necessary about. If the players, who are most affected by it, can move forward, then so can we. That simple
  14. I haven't seen Hawkins but somebody posted a thread about Gainwell and I didn't really get the hype.
  15. I'm not on the "draft a QB" train but this is a good article and I definitely can see the perspective. I'll "dawg" you for annoying posts and I'll celebrate for good ones. This is a good one.
  • Create New...