Jump to content


Pure Football
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by xSICKxWITHxITx

  1. Parson's over Phillips? Only negative thing I have heard on Parson's besides character is he doesn't have any pass rusher moves. Just his speed and some power.
  2. Anybody worth taking on defense? I would much rather add a stud on defense.
  3. Yes Ryans struggles came last year when he tried to hard to help the team that was struggling. Players and coaches. I mean what is going to impact the team the most this year? A T when we don't need one? A QB that will sit 2 years and still won't out play Ryan? Most likely we would get the most impact out of a Pitts or a Chase. Not sure about anyone o defense.
  4. Ryan had a tad struggle here and there. For the most part though the run game and the defense is what struggled. Dirk struggled. Matt will be bettern with the new scheme a lone.
  5. Yeah he is not a G and has improved and should improve even more under AS. Now if he sucked or we were going to move on then yeah I get Sewell. Or if we drafted Sewell to play G and take over for Jake in a year or 2 then yeah maybe. Jake still has 3-5 years at least though. Plus I listen to a podcast and he stated Sewell has never played G. So if we take him at 4 to play G why not take a G?
  6. So McGary a 1st round pick who has been getting better and should be a lot better in the new scheme needs to be replaced already? Gono is a good swing T. Matthews still has more than 2 years and he is playing at a high level. I am not thinking about needs really, but I would much rather get Chase or Pitts and they are not needs either.
  7. I look at it as Jake is at least a top 10 LT no need to replace him with a rookie who lets hope was the 7th best and he won't be as a rookie. So why take him at 4? To play RT or G? Just don't see it and see it as a wasted pick. If we needed a T or a huge upgrade then yeah I get that. I am sure we can get a pro bowler at 4 at a different position.
  8. RT? Where is McGary going?
  9. I know your a huge fan, but you don’t think it’s somewhat a wasted pick? Just don’t think we need a T. Where would you play him? Would you not rather trade back and get one of the DEs from The U?
  10. I think Debo played well, but also didn't play as well as he can or should if that makes sense. I felt like the entire team sort of quit at one time then turned it back up. Only problem with Debo I believe he had some mental errors. I think he will be fine, I still tink hes top 5 or 10 LB easily.
  11. I think it’s been most of the team and coaching. We shouldn’t have went 4-12 either.
  12. Lol no I guarantee we try to trade down if not my guess it’s Pitts, Chase or the best defensive player in their mind. It’s already been said we were in talks with the 49ers to trade down, but didn’t work out.
  13. I have a buddy who lives in Florida and swears the Jags are taking Fields. Also I read a WR the Jets took say he understood when he was signed Darnold would be the QB. Doesn't mean they won't take one and sit them behind Darnold though.
  14. And? I know you want a QB, but we would be stupid to draft one when we have one. If he was done next year then yeah I get it or if you had a loaded roster and did it for the money, I guess.
  15. I read 49ers were trading up for Lance at 3. So that leaves Fields most likely. I am sure we could trade back easir now that we know if you want a QB you have to come to 4. I am sure we are taking the calls now and could trade sooner than later. We hold all the cards though so no rush. I fully expect us to trade back even if it was the Panthers, but it would cost them.
  16. Thats the change we needed. Coaches and scheme not the players. Not saying we don't need to change some players, but mostly the coaches and scheme. We will compete this year more than people are thinking we will. I can easily seeing us being a wildcard. We will see how the rest of the offseaon and draft goes though.
  • Create New...