silentbob1272

The badasses of the left. We Trump supporters better recognize.

I don't care about insults. I do care about death threats to the president and rape threats to the First Lady. I never saw one threat to lynch Obama, if I had, my reaction would be exactly the same. That so many others are different now should cause those people to pause and examine how far we've sunk.

You gloss over the literally thousands of such examples on social media, but it's no big deal to threaten and wish death on the president. Ask Statick, Trump has other **** he should be worrying about.

Nah, it's the left. Look to your party's leadership as an example, or to your party's propaganda arm, or to your party's violent thugs posing as protesters for months on end now, or to your party's actual protesters for months on end now, or... you get the idea. The left has won the battle for the biggest crybaby b*tches by a sizable degree.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/324263-mcdonalds-tweets-to-trump-you-are-actually-a-disgusting-excuse

I think this helps McCain's legacy. All this time I just thought he was a huge piece of wishy washy Rino s**t. It turns out that he's ******* senile or maybe just insane. For that, I can have sympathy for him...not much, but some.

I can take the crying, pissing, and moaning. That's what has come to define the left, but the daily barrage of death and now rape threats? Not so much.

Not the wisest business move, but I still laughed. Speaking of disgusting though, have they never tried their own food?

It always comes back to being somehow on him? Nothing about the piece's of crap making these statements\threats, Not just Madonna, Snoop dog, or BW, but the many, many examples on a daily basis on social media, they just get ignored or brushed aside as you do here. Threats to kill you or rape and make your wife a sexual slave. Meh, doesn't he have more important things to worry about? GTFO

Is this accurately reported Terror Warning: Several Injured in French School Shooting So, in your opinion is Breitbart in fact a "real news" organization, or was sobeit's point valid? You can't have it both ways.

More than anything else this is the type crap that I find most annoying http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/324233-violent-threats-against-the-president-is-ok-now Violent threats against the president are OK now? Turn on TV or browse your newsfeeds on social media, and you will be bombarded with polemics about the sky falling and credible threats of violence against conservative figures. The FBI investigated a threat to kill Milo Yiannoupolis for the audacity to want to speak on a college campus. Threats against former Labor Secretary nominee Andy Puzder’s wife caused him to withdraw himself from consideration. Multiple intimidatory remarks haunted members of the Trump-voting Electoral College. President Trump has been the target of declarations of violence on a near daily basis. And yet, when it comes to this constant flow of threats, there seems to be little outrage from the nation’s leading journalists and pundits. Social media shines almost every day with a new dimwitted threat against Trump and his presidency. “Comedienne” Sarah Silverman called for a military coup. Madonna told protesters she “thought” about blowing up the White House. Violence seems to break out every time a conservative comes to speak at a college campus. Rosie O’Donnell talks about “stopping” Trump on Twitter. Snoop Dogg has done his best to get back on people’s radars since 1998 with his new music video in which he assassinates a clown dressed as Trump. Even if it was just a stunt by the 45-year-old rapper to stay relevant, it was still completely crass and unacceptable. The media has largely glossed over these serious threats with a shrug. A simple Google search on Snoop Dogg’s assassination video, for example, yields virtually no mainstream editorials expressing disgust. It’s almost as if there’s an overarching belief among the media that Trump brought this upon himself. All of these actions underlines what’s been obvious for a while now: The calls by President Obama for “civility” after the 2011 shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords were never genuine. The left only uses such efforts as a cudgel to silence their political foes, then turns around to call them Hitler when needed. The selective outrage is deafening. Obama was certainly the target of vicious remarks, but the calls for outright violence from the left have received nowhere near the same attention in the press as conservatives received during the Obama years. Every time a threatening, disrespectful, or unflattering comment was made about the former president, a national shaming storm sprung up. A staffer for an obscure congressman was forced to resign after stating that Obama’s daughters don’t show enough "class." Ex-congressman Joe Walsh was slammed in nearly every major outlet after he tweeted, “This is now war. Watch out Obama,” after five cops were fatally shot in Dallas. Even Tea Partiers were regularly called neo-Confederates. Selective outrage gets tiring, even in the Trump years. Both sides of the political spectrum seem to understand the concept of “outrage fatigue.” An Huffington Post op-ed asked its readers if they suffered from protest fatigue — the author wrote, "Daily I am poised to do something to ride the emotional tsunami." Fortunately for those of us constantly seeing crises on Facebook, we already have a term for such an ailment: The boy who cried wolf. Heck, the Onion was on this over a decade ago. Political tensions are reaching a boiling point and the mainstream media, pundits, and “analysts” do nothing but fan the flames. The American people are quick to pick up on coverage patterns. Many are still making up their own minds about President Trump but understand that he is doing his best. They know (and maybe support) that the Democrats are the opposition party. They don’t want the media to be another. These are serious times requiring serious attention – not just adoring coverage of ***** Hat protesters. At the end of the day it’s going to be the members of the traditional press gaggle left pointing fingers. Yesterday's example. Where are the p***y hats decrying this misogyny?

Then had I directed this joke at you, you might have a point, but I didn't so you don't.

No really good place to drop this, so this thread will do. Just sharing some pride.

That's no way for a Hillary supporter to speak of the woman he chose as his ruler.

They said the same of Trump, yet here we are with the media still looking for the red boogieman Part 12.