niels petersen

Agree with all of this. I think he has potential, but will need to be coached up with some moves and hand techniques. I wish he had a veteran edge pass rusher who could teach him that. Maybe Jarrett can be a mentor?

Well, I would say that he is only here because our current culture isn't that of a stabile and winning franchise. So I'd say accountability. I don't think he gets the job, if that isn't part of the package he brings. For a more game specific answer, I would say "scheme/spacing"

I agree with you. But I think these are the types of mistakes that younger coaches make when a lot is on the line. They can tighten up and abandon their principles a bit, when the stakes at high. Guys like Andy Reid on the other hand have seen everything and prepared for everything. He does not doubt going for it on 4th and 3 with his backup QB to win the game. He has prepared for it, and does not waver. That comes from experience, preparation and confidence in those situations. The question is, if LaFleur will learn from it, because there is potential learning from this game, which can make h

I don't think there is a smash hit player for us in this draft, so if he's our guy, then yeah, why not. I like Surtain. That said. I'd really prefer to trade down. We have 41 players under contract and have no cap space. We need cheap, young players, and the more the better.

I keep reading the thread title like this: "Fonte not to Be GM" 😅..

I think the Jets are indicating that they also may trade down, in order to get some offers from QB needy teams. So I guess we're no longer the main trade-partner for a QB.

He's a risk, no doubt. But honestly, this may be a good time to take a chance on a potential offensive guru. If Brady can get a lot out of Ryan, Julio, Ridley etc (and he should) and get some experienced help with running the defense, then we could be competitive already by next season. If he can't, then it is time to rebuild the roster anyway, which gives us a window to evaluate Brady as a leader of men and HC. We are in a position to give him a look to see if we think he will be a great HC 5 years from now. I think, if we are being honest about the state of the franchise, then it

It's tough. I think all of them are great OCs, But the question is if they'll be great HCs and who will be able to turn the culture around here? I'll take the gamble on Brady, in order to sustain a certain scheme for the next few years, and hope he'll surround himself with experienced coaches. Arthur Smith is second, because I believe he had the skills to field a solid and conmpetetive team, but I'm not sure he is much more than and offensive minded DQ. Hackett is third for me. Good experience but I see nothing special in teams of HC qualities. His sucess in GB may also - in lar

Love this scenario! 😃.. Trading back and getting both Farley and Harris would be and excellent move. Good job! 👏👏👏

Can't stop thinking about a DL pairing og Tupuola-Fetul and Tuioto-Mariner. Are there any more players with these kind of names in the draft? 😅

Eberfluss absolutely should be om our list, IMO. I suspect he would be able to put together a good staff og OC, DC and STC as well.

Maybe Matt is just a good QB, and the type of player most coaches would want to work with??

Kind of weird to dedicate a thread to no one in particular 😅.. But I'm with you. Beat the Aints!

I guess it's a bit odd, but I don't think we have time to be dilly-dallying around if we want to get one of the better head coaching candidates to come here. Also, the way the hierarchy is set up, and everybody reports to McKay, he might as well just hire who he wants anyway.

Get a HC with a vision, pick Sewell. Trade Mathews for an extra pick and use that on D and lets GOOOO!!