INTEGRITY Factor: Rank the Current Presidential Candidates in Anything but Football Posted December 28, 2007 JDaveG (12/27/2007)holymoses (12/27/2007)I think Clinton is definately the most "political animal" of the three democrats,That, to me, equals "lacking in integrity." I don't trust her to do anything other than what she thinks will get her another term.And that does not always equate to what she thinks will get her popularity amongst the voters, but rather (out of sheer political necessity) what she thinks will get her more funding. That's a **** dangerous woman. That's Bush III. With hairier legs and more balls, but still Bush III.but she has been more consistent on her core issues than Romney, and I think Huckabee is a total fraud.Based on what? Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to me you can disagree with the guy without impugning his character, to wit:I'm very surprised that you put Obama above Huckabee.I think Obama is less a politician at his core than Huckabee. Maybe he's got me completely snowed, but I get the feeling that he is in it for the right reasons. He's ambitious, but not for pecuniary reasons. I'll take that, even where I vehemently disagree with him on the issues, over a charlatan. How can you half way that guy? Either he's the real deal or he's Jimmy Swaggart in a better suit.How can you put him below Hillary-effing-Clinton without knowing which it is?If he's the real deal, isn't he light years ahead of a power-monger who prostitutes herself in a sham marriage to secure political power? Sorry to fail to pull punches on this one, but seriously. I can't see how you can downgrade someone in the integrity department based on what sounds like a hunch. And you rated Clinton middle-of-the-pack!How do you do those line item quotes?