ATLFalcon36

Pure Football
  • Content count

    2,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About ATLFalcon36

  • Rank
    True Falcon
  • Birthday 07/04/1988

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    yongin36
  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

12,099 profile views
  1. Agreed One of the big differences too, was Raheem started disguising Cover 3 and 1 looks WAY more. He'd have dudes showing Cover 3 or Cover 1 then drop to cover 2, and had many QBs confused.
  2. Yes, the remaining is from guaranteed money still owed by the Rams
  3. I'm still amused by this.
  4. Added two more post-Gurley Update Now that we signed Gurley, I took the BPA @ postion of need approach and re-did the draft: Draft F - Post-Gurley BPA/Position of Need I thought about going John Simpson instead of Anfernee, but I wnated the LB depth of starting Anfernee out at SLB. A super defense heavy draft, similar to my bolster the D draft but a little bit different. Draft G - Post-Gurley BPA/Position of Need #2 I wanted to go CB/LB/DT(or EDGE). If I was actually able to simulate tradedowns I'd rather trade down to 24-28 and take Diggs for the 5th year option and pick up another 2nd or 3rd so I can get DL sooner or an additional LB/CB or guard but I'll roll with these picks anyway.
  5. After Gurley I'm all about the bolster the d draft thank god we dont have to draft a rb after trading a 2nd
  6. Agreed. With this Gurley rumor swirling, and it seems to have some weight to it, it would completely shake up most of these scenarios. It would allow us to focus on defense mostly and grab a guard in there and we'd be right back in the thick of it. Gurley, Smith, Ollison/Hill would be a formidable trio and we'd have depth if Gurley's injury history proceeds. IF we end up with Gurley, it'd be better to take DL/EDGE in the first bc CB is deep in the 2nd, but so is DL/EDGE so pick 2 of any of the following guys in whatever draft order you want: Kinlaw, Chaisson, Epenesa (trade back only), Fulton, Henderson, Diggs, Terrell, Madubuike, Blacklock, Gallimore, Lewis, Okwara, Baun, Uche. That's a big pool at tremendous areas of need and a lot of these guys will be available in the 1st and 2nd.
  7. Henderson was gone at our pick like 80% of the time in all my draft sims, surprisngly gone more often than Kinlaw and KLC.
  8. I don't either. Some interesting observations from doing about 10 different sims to get these results: RB and CB thins out BAD during the 2nd round, and there's a steep drop-off after that. Occasionally (50%) of the time Akers and Edwards-Helaire fall to the 3rd. Giving up that 2nd, 2nd was a tremendous risk with that drop off in mind because we have severe needs at both positions. Kinlaw and Chaisson went in the Top 8 about 25% of the time. There's some REALLY good LB/EDGE in 3rd/4th type territory, very frequently, names like Uche, Taylor, Jennings, Okwara, etc. Going off how positions fell off, getting Cb and RB before the 4th will be important, our two 4ths being LB/EDGE/DT would make a lot of sense, there's still value there. Interior DL and OL have some great prospects in the 2nd-3rd range as well, if we end up going CB in the first there's still some great DL talent in the 3rd if we go RB in the 2nd. OL seems pretty deep in the 4th-7th ranges too, especially for interior guys, which we need. In terms of value, it seemed to me position ordering for BPA/need would be: DT/EDGE, CB/RB, CB/RB/DL(EDGE INCL), LB/DL(EDGE INCL)/OL, LB/DL/OL, CB/OL/LB, CB/WR/OL
  9. I agree with Fulton. I'd rather trade back to 22-28 and get Diggs/Terrell and pick up another Day 2 pick than take Fulton at 16.
  10. Ran a bunch of mocks on TDN's Draft Machine with 5 different approaches after the Hurst and Fowler acquisitions... Draft A - BPA @ Position of Need Fill the most needs with the BPA at any of those positions in whatever round. This fell poorly for filling corner, in the 2nd it came down to Dobbins/Taylor or Diggs/Terrell and both positions falloff hard afterwards. Draft B - Bolster the D Full focus on building a dominant D, Edwards-Helaire fell to the 3rd in this draft, and was tempting but stayed focused and aimed to get RB at value or UDFA (Though CEH was tremendous value in the third). I don't think Jennings will fall to the 4th in real life, but if he did he'd be perfect for the SLB role vacated by Campbell. He can cover, run, hit, tackle and rush the passer. I double dip at CB since it's a thin position, though I think we'll sign a vet CB in FA. The back-to-back of Kinlaw/Diggs is so strong it makes me really love this draft. Draft C - Needs-Based Just try to fill needs. I hate this draft but it fills a lot of needs. Draft D - Hybrid Approach I really just wanted to try a draft with KLC as our 1st rounder and see how to fill out the rest. I kinda went BPA/Needs mix here afterwards. I LOVE the Top 3, I think it's my favorite Top 3 out of all of them, but Draft A and B have awesome Top 3's too. Draft E - CB in the First I think this is the most realistic possibility since TD loves him some skill position players in the 1st, and CB is kinda our biggest need (though I still think Kinlaw/Chaisson would be better picks). I like Diggs/Terrell in the 2nd WAY better than Fulton/Henderson in the first, but I digress. I'd almost rather trade down to late 1st for Diggs/Terrell to get a 5th year option and pick up an extra 2nd or 3rd but here it is. In this draft CEH, Akers both fell to the third, I go with CEH because the guy was a beast last year. I go Jennings in the 4th to fill that SLB/Pass rush role that a Chaisson would take, and get good value. Pull a classic TD move and double dip at CB. Conclusion I can't really pick a favorite. I really love the Bolster the D draft, it's strong and sets us up for a dominant defense that we've desperately needed during Matt Ryan's career. I'd be happy with any of these drafts, they all improve the team in slightly different ways. If I had to pick ONE draft right now out of all of these I think A fills out the team most "evenly" but the Hybrid draft gets us the most day 1 starters. Update Now that we signed Gurley, I took the BPA @ postion of need approach and re-did the draft: Draft F - Post-Gurley BPA/Position of Need I thought about going John Simpson instead of Anfernee, but I wnated the LB depth of starting Anfernee out at SLB. A super defense heavy draft, similar to my bolster the D draft but a little bit different. Draft G - Post-Gurley BPA/Position of Need #2 I wanted to go CB/LB/DT(or EDGE). If I was actually able to simulate tradedowns I'd rather trade down to 24-28 and take Diggs for the 5th year option and pick up another 2nd or 3rd so I can get DL sooner or an additional LB/CB or guard but I'll roll with these picks anyway.
  11. I think our board will be something like: Simmons Okudah Kinlaw Chaisson Henderson Murray Fulton Epenesa Diggs I think we'll go any of those top 4 if they fall (maybe only the last 1 of kinlaw or chaisson) then if DE/DT is gone I think we go CB over LB.
  12. Disagree, only because Chaisson could have so many potential spots in the nickle when we're out of base 60% of the time. He's play that 4-3 under SLB lined up on the edge but also in Nickle he could play DE and give us packages like: Foye, Deion Chaisson, Grady, Takk, Fowler Deion, Chaisson Fowler, Grady, Cominsky, Takk Deion, Foye Chaisson, Grady, Cominsky/Davison, Takk
  13. With the release of Trufant this is more likely now, TD can't resist him some corners. I honestly don't hate this draft if we went CJ Henderson or Fulton but honestly would MUCH prefer Kinlaw/Chaisson/Epenesa/trade back
  14. I always look forward to these @Draftnut57 your track record speaks for itself. I like the mock overall, fills a lot of needs. I really hate the tradedown. If we didn't trade, who would you take at 16? Who would you take with our 2 seconds in that scenario. I put up some TDN mocks and the one that spoke to AFMB the most was a Top 4 of Kinlaw (he fell), Dobbins, Uche, Moss (TE) but if Kinlaw goes before 16, which is very likely, how do you feel about Chaisson at 16 if Kinlaw is gone? Or who is your 2nd choice after Kinlaw?