Forum Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About J-Nice

  • Rank
    Starting Lineup

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

5,310 profile views
  1. So is the Braves' hitting that good or was it just a terrible day for the Phillies?
  2. Both good. I think Neal covers TEs better. TEs used to be our weak point on D for many years. Both are hammers on the field. Willie Mo had better hands and route jumping instincts. Neal is a better tackler. I take Neal off tackling technique alone, as mentioned, Willie Mo got hurt every year after like his 2nd year and it was mainly because of him getting hurt tackling someone. I think Neal will continue to improve his ball skills.
  3. Lets get it #inbrotherhood
  4. Barely mentioned our defense. A lazy, emotionally driven article.
  5. A disappointment but not a failure. I see a team that has the potential to win it all in a year or two because of the talent that we have. I think the experience of this season will ultimately help next season and beyond. From the coaches and player's standpoint.
  6. Sark may be #10 on the list of offensive problems this year. Why cant yall see that? overall execution and penalties should be the #1 and #2.
  7. Trash album from a great rapper.
  8. I know the question wasnt directed toward me but I personally think "ballhawk" isn't a personel issue, its a mentality issue. I just think our DBs need to take more risks and go for the INT more when the ball is in the air. I dont think we have to "upgrade" our corners. just keep bringing in and developing young talent.
  9. For all of those who think people are fear mongering or thinking the way we receive or pay for our data and services will not change with the removal of Net Neutrality, here's proof. Corps has f***ed with their consumers in the past. NN was established so they couldn't. Here's a list of the some of the violations: Net Neutrality Violations: A Brief History Timothy Karr April 25, 2017 Net Neutrality Fighting Media Consolidation The FCC and Media Policy Note: This is an updated version of an older post. Due to the Trump administration's recent attacks on Net Neutrality, we felt it was important to resurface these important examples of what happens when cable and phone companies are left to their own devices. For years a lineup of phone- and cable-industry spokespeople has called Net Neutrality “a solution in search of a problem.” The principle that protects free speech and innovation online is irrelevant, they claim, as blocking has never, ever happened. And if it did, they add, market forces would compel internet service providers to correct course and reopen their networks. In reality, many providers both in the United States and abroad have violated the principles of Net Neutrality — and they plan to continue doing so in the future. This history of abuse revealed a problem that the FCC’s 2015 Net Neutrality protections solved. Those rules are now under threat from Trump’s FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, who is determined to hand over control of the internet to massive internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon: MADISON RIVER: In 2005, North Carolina ISP Madison River Communications blocked the voice-over-internet protocol (VOIP) service Vonage. Vonage filed a complaint with the FCC after receiving a slew of customer complaints. The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today. COMCAST: In 2005, the nation’s largest ISP, Comcast, began secretly blocking peer-to-peer technologies that its customers were using over its network. Users of services like BitTorrent and Gnutella were unable to connect to these services. 2007 investigations from the Associated Press, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others confirmed that Comcast was indeed blocking or slowing file-sharing applications without disclosing this fact to its customers. TELUS: In 2005, Canada’s second-largest telecommunications company, Telus, began blocking access to a server that hosted a website supporting a labor strike against the company. Researchers at Harvard and the University of Toronto found that this action resulted in Telus blocking an additional 766 unrelated sites. AT&T: From 2007–2009, AT&T forced Apple to block Skype and other competing VOIP phone services on the iPhone. The wireless provider wanted to prevent iPhone users from using any application that would allow them to make calls on such “over-the-top” voice services. The Google Voice app received similar treatment from carriers like AT&T when it came on the scene in 2009. WINDSTREAM: In 2010, Windstream Communications, a DSL provider with more than 1 million customers at the time, copped to hijacking user-search queries made using the Google toolbar within Firefox. Users who believed they had set the browser to the search engine of their choice were redirected to Windstream’s own search portal and results. MetroPCS: In 2011, MetroPCS, at the time one of the top-five U.S. wireless carriers, announced plans to block streaming video over its 4G network from all sources except YouTube. MetroPCS then threw its weight behind Verizon’s court challenge against the FCC’s 2010 open internet ruling, hoping that rejection of the agency’s authority would allow the company to continue its anti-consumer practices. PAXFIRE: In 2011, the Electronic Frontier Foundation found that several small ISPs were redirecting search queries via the vendor Paxfire. The ISPs identified in the initial Electronic Frontier Foundation report included Cavalier, Cogent, Frontier, Fuse, DirecPC, RCN and Wide Open West. Paxfire would intercept a person’s search request at Bing and Yahoo and redirect it to another page. By skipping over the search service’s results, the participating ISPs would collect referral fees for delivering users to select websites. AT&T, SPRINT and VERIZON: From 2011–2013, AT&T, Sprint and Verizon blocked Google Wallet, a mobile-payment system that competed with a similar service called Isis, which all three companies had a stake in developing. EUROPE: A 2012 report from the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications found that violations of Net Neutrality affected at least one in five users in Europe. The report found that blocked or slowed connections to services like VOIP, peer-to-peer technologies, gaming applications and email were commonplace. VERIZON: In 2012, the FCC caught Verizon Wireless blocking people from using tethering applications on their phones. Verizon had asked Google to remove 11 free tethering applications from the Android marketplace. These applications allowed users to circumvent Verizon’s $20 tethering fee and turn their smartphones into Wi-Fi hot spots. By blocking those applications, Verizon violated a Net Neutrality pledge it made to the FCC as a condition of the 2008 airwaves auction. AT&T: In 2012, AT&T announced that it would disable the FaceTime video-calling app on its customers’ iPhones unless they subscribed to a more expensive text-and-voice plan. AT&T had one goal in mind: separating customers from more of their money by blocking alternatives to AT&T’s own products. VERIZON: During oral arguments in Verizon v. FCC in 2013, judges asked whether the phone giant would favor some preferred services, content or sites over others if the court overruled the agency’s existing open internet rules. Verizon counsel Helgi Walker had this to say: “I’m authorized to state from my client today that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.” Walker’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it on at least five separate occasions during arguments. The court struck down the FCC’s rules in January 2014 — and in May FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler opened a public proceeding to consider a new order. In response millions of people urged the FCC to reclassify broadband providers as common carriers and in February 2015 the agency did just that. Since his appointment in January 2017, FCC Chairman Pai has sought to dismantle the agency's landmark Net Neutrality rules. He must be stopped. In the absence of any rules, violations of the open internet will become more and more common. Don’t believe me? Let history be the guide. https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history
  10. Execute. Keep playing physical on Defense. Give Hooper some sticky gloves