Jump to content


Pure Football
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About flrybranch

  • Rank
    Roster Player

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,738 profile views
  1. But cutting bottom of the roster players doesn't help with the CAP. You count the top 51. If you cut player 51, then player 52 just slides up a spot. After you move out of the top 20 or so player the savings to the CAP are minimal. Take the Senat example we see others putting out there. He has a $920K CAP hit. But if you cut him then Greg Dortch moves into the top 51 with his $780K CAP hit. So cutting Senat saves you all of $140K
  2. Everything you say is true. But, restructuring Grady costs $6Mish in 2022 CAP. Everything the team does at this point will have a negative effect on the 2022 CAP. Its going to take 2021 & 2022 before TF can work out all the CAP issues.
  3. Fixed it for ya. As to the other players mentioned. Senat - He nets you around $140k if cut. Gono - TF just tendered him earlier this offseason. Not saying he can't be cut, but reasonable to think TF/AS want to keep him if they tendered him Oliver - Nets you $1.4M if cut. That helps but isn't close to $6.5M. I also think Oliver has enough potential left that his CAP number is reasonable. Keith Smith - Nets less than $100K if cut Don't just look at the "Cap Savings" column, you have to add back the $780K that the next lowest cap player. When you cut one of these gu
  4. So need to create roughly 8-9M in space between now and season start. 6.5 for rookies +1.5 for top 53 minus roughly 1M currently available = 7M Then whatever is needed above the 7M for the AJM contract. Most teams want to have at least 1-2M available at seasons start to sign vets that may have been cut. So 8-9M needed by game 1. Still say we have to restructure Grady or trade Julio to have a comfortable margin. I much prefer the former to the later. Edit: Cause I suck at math
  5. No No No, that's what got me my waist. During camp those guys will be burning 5K Calories a day. That will be a snack for them
  6. Skinny waist lack of functional strength gets walked back. those were some of the weaknesses I have read. Back in my day it was called being a light axx. Not saying he can't overcome these things, and in a ZBS it is less important, but really like it when the OL's backside can double for the screen in the projector room.
  7. Very good overall class. Let's come back in 3 years and really see what the team got
  8. Thanks for posting @Monolith2001 I got a new favorite player now!! Best press conference of the weekend.
  9. Really surprised how SERIOUSLY people are taking this. I put that "10 minutes of youtube scouting" there thinking it would be obvious I wasn't taking myself too seriously LOL. Didn't call anyone a scrub, called him a JAG.
  10. Typo that I somehow continued to miss even after reading your post...... Fixed now.
  11. LOL, I read your posts man. that's kinda pot and kettle. I'll give you some props, you do post thoughtful and informative things at times, but most of your posts are, lacking much substance.
  12. LOL Hope you picked up on my self-deprecating humor when I mentioned my 10 minutes of youtube scouting there bro. Don't pretend to have more information than the professionals.
  13. Definitely Benefit of the Doubt for their first draft.
  14. Dang man, did I hit a nerve or something?
  • Create New...