capologist

^^^working hard for the D.bag of the day award...

No, I don't excuse "everything" he does and no, saying he acts childish is not the same as excusing him in my opinion. The problem is acting childish isn't against the law nor violate any code of ethics that I'm aware of so I choose not to get wound up over everything...

LOL, glad you limited it to FBI heads which haven't been exactly numerous (15) but no, I'll stick with the fact that, not job specific to FBI, people have committed perjury in the past...

Guess you conveniently missed the Sessions posts, the healthcare posts, etc. Agenda much?

Can't exactly stop it either. There's no law that requires the President or any other politician to not be snarky and childish on social media. If so, there'd be a lot of politicians leaving DC. Maybe you are on to something here...

Wouldn't be the first time it happened. Not saying that it's the case but we'll probably never know. I think we've already established Trump acts rather childish...lol

Sorry, I don't see that as being any worse than Obama on live TV during a press conference telling Republicans they can come along for the ride but will have to ride in the back of the bus. It's a tweet, whoopteedoo...

This one of the few Trump tweets that I actually thought was smart. If you think someone may try to CYA and lie, throw it out there and maybe it keeps them in line to the tell the truth. No idea if that's what happened for certain but given what many expected that never happened, it could very well be the case. Although I think the last part isn't quite what was said/meant...

on a Thursday...

So you never bluff when playing poker? "He better hope there aren't any tapes" isn't the same as "I have tapes of those conversations"...

Hopefully he resigns...

One of the many reasons I support body cameras being mandatory and on at all times...

When you are asking for both sides to be equally investigated, yeah, it's riding the middle legitimately. Like I said in response to your 3rd sentence, the Ukraine matter is being looked into. Now, the question no one has asked me (and I'll volunteer the answer here) is do I feel the Ukraine thing was wrong. My answer is the same as the Trump meeting, if it's just a matter of getting information on the opponent without financial implications or some other dirty dealings then no, I don't feel it's wrong. If DTJ made promises or money exchanged, then absolutely there's a problem. Right now, there's nothing to say that occurred--doesn't mean there won't be if it's investigated and yes, it should be investigated...

You see that big bolded sentence I highlighted? You know why I did so? BECAUSE I NEVER SAID THAT!!! As a matter of fact , I actually said the meeting SHOULD BE investigated at least 3 times so that renders your entire argument moot. The big problem in your first 2 sentences is that's it's literally saying "As long as you lose, who cares if you cheated". That's the big difference between myself and some of the people on this thread: I believe ANYONE who tries to cheat in an election needs to be held accountable to preserve our election process as much as possible...

Half of that is your words not mine but nevermind accuracy to attempt an attack right?