Jump to content





Martial Law By Executive Order - The Usa Is Under Martial Law, Now.

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:01 AM

The United States is essentially now under martial law without the exigencies of a national emergency. THANK ABOUT THAT.......
"Finally, the 2012 NDAA was hurried through the House and Senate almost like a covert op with minimal public attention or debate. It was then signed by the president at 9:00 PM on New Year's Eve while virtually nobody was paying attention to much other than the approaching new year. This new Executive Order was written and signed in complete secret and then quietly released by the White House on its website without comment. All this was done under a president who studied constitutional law at Harvard." http://www.huffingto...&comm_ref=false

You guys/gals should talk abt this.
(Topic approved by Deisel)

#2 Google Bot

Google Bot

    Starting Lineup

  • Banned Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,733 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:04 AM

Supposedly studied at Harvard. I still haven't seen the transcripts.

THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS, PATRIOT!

#3 cnasty

cnasty

    Even Elvis keeps his pimp hand strong

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,786 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:11 AM

Never before has this been more relevant...



#4 Gritzblitz 2.0

Gritzblitz 2.0

    Veteran Falcon

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,204 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:27 AM

It's a legitimate topic that should be discussed but won't. I can't imagine anyone here being cool with the powers that the government is assuming.

But since it's a snake topic, it will end up being about him. Or rather, abt him.

#5 mdrake34

mdrake34

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,664 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:31 AM

in b4 mad

#6 Forever Julian

Forever Julian

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

Is Harvard really as prestigious as people make of it?

I know a girl who went to Georgia State with me who is at KSG, and her GPA was literally terrible I know for a fact it was ~3.0.

#7 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:43 AM

View PostDeisel, on 11 March 2013 - 10:01 AM, said:

The United States is essentially now under martial law without the exigencies of a national emergency. THANK ABOUT THAT.......
"Finally, the 2012 NDAA was hurried through the House and Senate almost like a covert op with minimal public attention or debate. It was then signed by the president at 9:00 PM on New Year's Eve while virtually nobody was paying attention to much other than the approaching new year. This new Executive Order was written and signed in complete secret and then quietly released by the White House on its website without comment. All this was done under a president who studied constitutional law at Harvard." http://www.huffingto...&comm_ref=false

You guys/gals should talk abt this.
(Topic approved by Deisel)
This is a HUGE story and nobody cares. The stripping of citizens rights, the drones over our skies and the Buying up HUGE volumes of ammunition by govt entities, is mind boggling. What are they preparing for? GREECE? Major unrest when our economy colapses? Add the out right zeal by the administration to take away gun ownership and or get everybody on a list, as to GO DOOR TO DOOR TO seize those guns, and you can imagine a civil unrest coming to our country like we've never seen before, minus the civil war.

#8 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:45 AM

"The 2012 NDAA deemed the United States a "battlefield,"... and gave the president and his agents the right to seize and arrest any U.S. citizen, detain them indefinitely without charge or trial, and do so only on suspicion, without any judicial oversight or due process. The new Executive Order states that the president and his secretaries have the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States. The Government can also forcibly draft U.S. citizens ... to fulfill "labor requirements"
And the left complained abt the Patriot Act. Wake up folks......

#9 Psychic Gibbon

Psychic Gibbon

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,923 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:03 AM

The NDAAs need to end entirely. They've become something Congressionals can't vote against without being labeled one thing or another and they can put almost anything they want in it.

#10 MAD597

MAD597

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3,326 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:33 AM

Looks like the welcher is back for good huh? Boy that 2 years sure flew by fast

#11 Knight of God

Knight of God

    AFMB Hall of Fame

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 39,455 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:39 AM

We have been in martial law since the Civil War. It was never rescinded. No one listened while Bush was in office though...lol

#12 Statick

Statick

    Falcon Lord

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,303 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:43 AM

It's the Defense Production Act of 1950, revisited.

#13 Google Bot

Google Bot

    Starting Lineup

  • Banned Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,733 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:51 AM

View Postmdrake34, on 11 March 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:

in b4 mad

By a whole hour.

#14 mdrake34

mdrake34

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,664 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:54 AM

View PostGoogle Bot, on 11 March 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:

By a whole hour.

He's slipping.

#15 mdrake34

mdrake34

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,664 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 12:30 PM

Now steve is back too . . .

Posted Image

#16 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:27 PM

http://www.breitbart...t-the-Beginning
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a member of the Democratic Party’s leadership in the House of Representatives, suggested to Jason Mattera at a Feb. 13 women’s rights rally that plans for an assault weapons ban and private-sales background checks were only the beginning of a broader gun control agenda extending to handguns as well.

Schakowsky evidently did not recognize Mattera, a conservative video journalist and senior investigative reporter for Talk Radio Network, who infamously confronted Vice President Joe Biden in the Capitol. (Mattera introduced himself to Schakowsky by name but did not indicate that he was filming or that he is conservative.) She spoke to Mattera as if he were a fellow gun control enthusiast--and Mattera played along, eliciting answers about Schakowsky’s enthusiasm for gun control.
“We want everything on the table,” Schakowsky told Mattera. “This is a moment of opportunity. There’s no question about it.”
Schakowsky’s remarks about plans for broader gun control are not the first time she has revealed the long-term goal behind short-term policy debates. She has a tendency to do so when speaking to apparently sympathetic audiences. In 2009, she told a crowd that the goal of Obamacare would be to “put the private insurance industry out of business.”

Edited by Deisel, 11 March 2013 - 01:29 PM.


#17 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:36 PM

http://www.forbes.co...l-conversation/
The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice.  It confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition.  As reported elsewhere, some of this purchase order is for hollow-point rounds, forbidden by international law for use in war, along with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month.  Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years.  In America.
Add to this perplexing outré purchase of ammo, DHS now is showing off its acquisition of heavily armored personnel carriers, repatriated from the Iraqi and Afghani theaters of operation.  As observed by “paramilblogger” Ken Jorgustin last September:

#18 Dago 3.0

Dago 3.0

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,340 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:40 PM

you are fooling yourself if you think the Dems are doing this by themselves

check out the voting record for the 2012 NDAA

https://votesmart.or...te#.UT4ffjD4uVo

by my count, you had 43 Republicans and 93 Democrats vote Nay

you had 186 Republicans and 97 Democrats vote Yea

#19 Deisel

Deisel

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,814 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:45 PM

View PostDago 3.0, on 11 March 2013 - 01:40 PM, said:

you are fooling yourself if you think the Dems are doing this by themselves

check out the voting record for the 2012 NDAA

https://votesmart.or...te#.UT4ffjD4uVo

by my count, you had 43 Republicans and 93 Democrats vote Nay

you had 186 Republicans and 97 Democrats vote Yea
Dago, I agree that we should all be concerned and this is across all parties as well. What the heck is going on?

#20 Dago 3.0

Dago 3.0

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,340 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 02:00 PM

View PostDeisel, on 11 March 2013 - 01:45 PM, said:

Dago, I agree that we should all be concerned and this is across all parties as well. What the heck is going on?

don't know. it isn't like Congress didn't realize that they were giving the president this authority

you had a 50/50 split among Dems and a 75/25 split among Republicans. You can't say that the Repubs wanted this in anticipation of the next President being Republican because it wouldn't be too difficult for Obama to declare a state of emergency before his term ends

I can't see the reasoning unless

1) our government KNOWS something bad is coming and it ain't the global war on terrorism

2) Conspiracy theorists aren't just bonkers