Jump to content





Refs Cheated For The Aints

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
153 replies to this topic

#1 footballislyfe

footballislyfe

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 513 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:27 PM

Bucs caugt game tying td and they called illegal touch on the wr. He was pushed out of bounds in the endzone but he was the first guy to touch it. I understand that but how u dont call illegal contact if u seen him pushed out of bounds 15 yards down field?

#2 Krammmit

Krammmit

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 994 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:27 PM

Saints win on a penalty...Huh, sounds familiar.

#3 4EL

4EL

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 736 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:28 PM

Are you really shocked the NFL and the refs will do everything possible to make sure the Taints get in the playoffs

#4 Joremarid

Joremarid

    AFMB Hall of Fame

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,546 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:28 PM

(d)  An eligible receiver who has been out of bounds prior to or during a pass, even if he has re-established himself
inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands.
Exception: If an eligible receiver is forced out of bounds by a foul by a defender, including illegal contact, defensive holding,
or defensive pass interference, he will become eligible to legally touch the pass (without prior touching by another eligible
receiver or defender) as soon as he re-establishes himself inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than
his hands. See Article 8, Note 3.


http://static.nfl.co...Pass_Fumble.pdf

look under article 6

#5 Faithful Falcon

Faithful Falcon

    Veteran Falcon

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,606 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:29 PM

Just makes me hate them even more.  I hope we leave them laying on the field.

#6 jamescbr

jamescbr

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 498 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:31 PM

View PostJoremarid, on 21 October 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:

(d)  An eligible receiver who has been out of bounds prior to or during a pass, even if he has re-established himself
inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands.
Exception: If an eligible receiver is forced out of bounds by a foul by a defender, including illegal contact, defensive holding,
or defensive pass interference, he will become eligible to legally touch the pass (without prior touching by another eligible
receiver or defender) as soon as he re-establishes himself inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than
his hands. See Article 8, Note 3.


http://static.nfl.co...Pass_Fumble.pdf

look under article 6
describes what happened....except they ignored the illegal contact

#7 footballislyfe

footballislyfe

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 513 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:31 PM

mike peria just said it was leagl contact bc freeman was outside the pocket. I didnt know illegal contact goes off when a qb leaves the pocket

#8 hooshman

hooshman

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 251 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:32 PM

He was clearly illegally contacted in the back of the endzone to be forced out of bounds. But, I guess that was a "judgement" call by the Katrina refs.

#9 yoyo0

yoyo0

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:32 PM

Every game the refs do. Every single game!

#10 Peyton

Peyton

    AFMB Hall of Fame

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,202 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:33 PM

Yeah, there was nothing remotely controversial on that play.  Once the QB gets out of the pocket, the WRs are fair game.

#11 ICD

ICD

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,968 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:33 PM

We need those ratings

#12 youngbloodz

youngbloodz

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,315 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:36 PM

QB was out the pocket. So he could bump him out of bounds. As much as I hate the Saints the refs didn't cheat

#13 Krammmit

Krammmit

    Roster Player

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 994 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:36 PM

That sounds like BS. So are they saying that once a QB leaves the pocket the dbs are allowed to push WRs? That sounds stupid.

#14 Peyton

Peyton

    AFMB Hall of Fame

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,202 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:37 PM

View PostKrammmit, on 21 October 2012 - 03:36 PM, said:

That sounds like BS. So are they saying that once a QB leaves the pocket the dbs are allowed to push WRs? That sounds stupid.

Send a letter to Rich McKay, he is a the Chairman on the rules committee.

#15 Faithful Falcon

Faithful Falcon

    Veteran Falcon

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,606 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:37 PM

View PostPeyton, on 21 October 2012 - 03:33 PM, said:

Yeah, there was nothing remotely controversial on that play.  Once the QB gets out of the pocket, the WRs are fair game.
So, the defender could have tackled Mike Williams, and no pass interference could have been called?  That's one of the most stupid rules in football.

#16 Faithful Falcon

Faithful Falcon

    Veteran Falcon

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,606 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:38 PM

Then Fox is all on Drew Brees' B***s talking about he's the top performer, when Josh Freenman had a better game.

#17 atl falcon 89

atl falcon 89

    Professor

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,859 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:39 PM

I wanted to see the Taints lose as much as the next guy but I'm not going to get all hot and bothered cause the Buccaneers got cheated. HeII this moves us slightly up in the division. C'mon guys the Saints aren't catching anyone with that defense Posted Image

#18 Bill Brasky

Bill Brasky

    is a son of a *****

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,966 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:40 PM

Posted Image

#19 youngbloodz

youngbloodz

    Pro Bowler

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,315 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:40 PM

Well pass interference doesn't matter when it comes to a QB leaving the pocket. Illegal contact does.

#20 falcon_owns_nfc_south

falcon_owns_nfc_south

    Veteran Falcon

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,379 posts

Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:41 PM

Bucs and saints both are 4 games behind us....oh meow..who cares