Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:55 AM
More info on these in this article:
Posted 11 October 2012 - 08:10 AM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:04 AM
Wheres the Benghazi wasnt attacked by protestors option?
That's not a conspiracy theory, that's fact.
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:44 AM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:51 AM
This will probably sound hilarious, but I think the Roswell alien landing is the most believable.
Here's the write-up in the article about that one:
3. A flying saucer crashed at Roswell in 1947 - The event that kick-started more than a half century of conspiracy theories surrounding unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Something did crash at Roswell, New Mexico, sometime before July 7, 1947 and - at first - the US authorities stated explicitly that this was a flying saucer or disk - as shown by the splash story on that day's Roswell Daily Record, pictured. Numerous witnesses reported seeing metallic debris scattered over a wide area and at least one reported seeing a blazing craft crossing the sky shortly before it crashed. In recent years, witnesses have added significant new details, including claims of a large military operation dedicated to recovering alien craft and aliens themselves, at as many as 11 crash sites, and alleged witness intimidation. In 1989, former mortician Glenn Dennis claimed that he was involved in alien autopsies which were carried out at the Roswell air force base.
The conspiracy theory has been fanned by the US military repeatedly changing its story. Within hours of the army telling reporters that it had recovered a crashed saucer, senior officers insisted that the only thing that had fallen from the sky had been a weather balloon. A report by the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force released in 1995, concluded that the reported recovered material in 1947 was likely debris from a secret government program called Project Mogul, which involved high altitude balloons meant to detect sound waves generated by Soviet atom bomb tests and ballistic missiles. A second report, released in 1997, concluded that reports of alien bodies were likely a combination of innocently transformed memories of military accidents involving injured or killed personnel, and the recovery of anthropomorphic dummies in military programs like Project High Dive conducted in the 1950s.
Since the late 1990s the debate about Roswell has polarised with several former pro-UFO researchers concluding that the craft was, indeed, part of a US military project and that it was, most likely, some sort of weather balloon. But further evidence has emerged - notably a signed affidavit by Walter Haut, the Roswell Army Air Field public affairs officer who had drafted the initial press release on July 8, 1947. Haut says in the affidavit -signed in 2002 - that he saw alien corpses and a craft and that he had been involved in a military cover up. Haut died in 2005.
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:53 AM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:58 AM
For me, it's easily the JFK assassination. Too much extraneous information to buy the theory that Oswald acted alone.
That's what I voted as well. Here's the write-up:
2. The assassination of John F Kennedy - The 35th President of the United States was shot on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas at 12.30pm . He was fatally wounded by gunshots while riding with his wife - Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy - in a motorcade. The ten-month investigation of the Warren Commission of 1963 to 1964, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) of 1976 to 1979, and other government investigations concluded that the President had been assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald - who was himself shot dead by Jack Ruby while in police custody.
But doubts about the official explanation and the conclusion that Oswald was the lone gunman firing from the Texas Book Depository overlooking Dealey Plaza where Kennedy was hit surfaced soon after the commission report. Footage of the motorcade taken by Abraham Zapruder on 8mm film supported the growing belief that at least four shots were fired - not the three that the Warren Commission claimed. The moments of impact recorded on the film also suggested that at least one of the shots came from a completely different direction to those supposedly fired by Oswald - evidence backed up by testimony of several eye witnesses. Many believed that several shots were fired by gunmen hiding behind a picket fence on a grassy knoll overlooking the plaza.
The assassination is still the subject of widespread speculation and has spawned numerous conspiracy theories, though none of these has been proven. In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) found both the original FBI investigation and the Warren Commission Report to be seriously flawed. The HSCA also concluded that there were at least four shots fired and that it was probable that a conspiracy existed. However, later studies, including one by the National Academy of Sciences, have called into question the accuracy of the evidence used by the HSCA to support its finding of four shots.
This link also has interesting info about the film released to the media:
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:59 AM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 10:13 AM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 10:25 AM
I had an interesting history teacher in high school who had all kinds of crazy theories and opinions and tried to teach them to the class. He made us write down a list of 8 different people/organizations who were behind JFK's assassination.
Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:58 AM
Did I miss something on this "conspiracy theory"?
Posted 11 October 2012 - 12:28 PM
I said chemicals in our water because I know that one to be true. They've been putting flouride in water for decades, and supposedly that has had more of a positive impact on tooth decay than brushing.
Did I miss something on this "conspiracy theory"?
Write up on that one:
24. Fluoridation - Fluoride is commonly added to drinking water as a way to reduce tooth decay. However, there has been some evidence that there could be some harmful side effects from fluoride and conspiracy theorists believe that this information is known and recognised by those responsible for adding the fluoride, but that they continue the practice regardless. Drug companies have been targeted as possible beneficiaries, as they will profit from a population with ill-health. Another motive is that fluoride lowers mental abilities thereby "dumbing down" the entire population.
Posted 11 October 2012 - 05:55 PM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:41 PM
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:01 PM
JFK. I'll go to my grave with the belief that Oswald did not act alone. The key to this for me is the amount of time (five seconds I think) he would have had to get off those shots with that kind of accuracy is virtually impossible. Also eye witness testimony and the Jack Ruby connection are hard to simply deny.
This has been proven false. Firstly the shot was an easy shot. Secondly, Oswald was an expert shot. Thirdly the shot has been reproduced numerous times. The best evidence that the shot is possible, however, is that Oswald did it.
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:29 PM
I'm surprised Tupac faking his death wasn't on the list
Posted 11 October 2012 - 08:06 PM
Although I don't think it's possible to have a conspiracy THEORY against an unproven theory. Just conflicting theories.
This would be like asking if there is a conspiracy to hide the existence of Xenu.
Edited by unbillievable, 11 October 2012 - 08:07 PM.
Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:29 AM
9/11was an inside job.
Write-up on that one:
1. September 11, 2001 - Thanks to the power of the web and live broadcasts on television, the conspiracy theories surrounding the events of 9/11 - when terrorists attacked the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington - have surpassed those of Roswell and JFK in traction. Despite repeated claims by al-Qaeda that it planned, organised and orchestrated the attacks, several official and unofficial investigations into the collapse of the Twin Towers which concluded that structural failure was responsible and footage of the events themselves, the conspiracy theories continue to grow in strength.
At the milder end of the spectrum are the theorists who believe that the US government had prior warning of the attacks but did not do enough to stop them. Others believe that the Bush administration deliberately turned a blind eye to those warnings because it wanted a pretext to launch wars in the Middle East to usher in another century of American hegemony. A large group of people - collectively called the 9/11 Truth Movement - cite evidence that an airliner did not hit the Pentagon and that the World Trade Centre could not have been brought down by airliner impacts and burning aviation fuel alone. This final group points to video evidence which they claim shows puffs of smoke - so-called demoliton squibs - emerging from the Twin Towers at levels far below the aircraft impact zones and prior to the collapses. They also believe that, on the day itself, the US air force was deliberately stood down or sent on exercises to prevent intervention that could have saved the lives of nearly 3,000 people.
Many witnesses - including firemen, policemen and people who were inside the towers at the time - claim to have heard explosions below the aircraft impacts (including in basement levels) and before both the collapses and the attacks themselves. As with the assassination of JFK, the official inquiry into the events - the 9/11 Commission Report - is widely derided by the conspiracy community and held up as further evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job". Scientific journals have consistently rejected these hypotheses.