80burgers, on 07 May 2012 - 03:39 PM, said:
Now for what Hargrove's declaration doesn't say. At no point in the declaration does Hargrove admit to any knowledge of the existence of a bounty program. Indeed, at no point does Hargrove claim that he was told to say anything different from what he would have otherwise said, without coaching.
In other words, Hargrove never says he was told to lie. Instead, he says he was told what to say, without commenting on whether he believed what he was told to say to be the truth.
And so, when the NFL said last week in the announcement of the suspensions of Hargrove and three other players that the declaration "established not only the existence of the program with the Saints, but also that he knew about and participated in it," that statement was blatantly incorrect. And when "independent" counsel Mary Jo White explained in a conference call last week that the "thrust" of the declaration was Hargrove's acknowledgment of "the nature of the program and his participation in it," that was blatantly incorrect, too.
It may simply be semantics, given that Williams and Vitt apparently confessed to the existence of a bounty program — which necessarily means that Hargrove had lied. But in his declaration he never says that he lied, and he never admits that the bounty program existed. The flaw in the NFL's comments about the Hargrove declaration is subtle, but significant. The plain language of the Hargrove declaration as compared to the NFL's characterization of it shows that the league is playing a little fast and loose with the facts. Which makes it even more critical that the league stop spoon-feeding the NFLPA and the media characterizations and summaries and conclusions, and that it start coughing up the raw data on which the characterizations and summaries and conclusions were based.
Back when I was practicing law, I'd periodically explain to a jury that, upon encountering a piece of rancid meat in a pot of beef stew, the reaction isn't to keep eating but to dump it all out. Though the league's mischaracterization of Hargrove's declaration may not justify ignoring the full weight of the bounty probe, it means that, at a minimum, someone must have an opportunity to scrutinize all facts, apart from the skewed, self-serving filter the league has applied when talking about the case.
There you go!
Im guess that "Back when I was practicing law" meant that you didn't win any cases, because that is a terrible example.
Does anyone else find it funny remarkable that coaches, and players have all admitted to this program, yet there are still several players and fans that demand that the NFL shows proof of this "Bounty" existing. You should hear Darren Sharpers interview with ESPN, where he stated that the program was in place, but the coaches never once warned them that they were being investigated, or that they should stop.
All in all, it just shows how pathetic the Saints organization really is. While writing this I have been playing the world smallest violin in sympathy for the Saints.