pintaildrake1, on 12 March 2012 - 03:16 PM, said:
Ok, that is what the article that was linked to said. Covering up an infraction, no matter how small, always ends up being the worst decision and the penalty is worse than if admitting it in the first place.
yeah there is a lot more to it, but the article didn't go into detail since there has already been articles on what happened. basically georgia tech's administration and cpj did not listen to the ncaa's direction. they should have declared thomas ineligible after he accepted gifts from a former player who was a runner for an agent. however they ignore the ncaa's direction there and played him anyways. also the ncaa told the AD Dan Radakovich to not share information of the impending investigative interview with morgan burnette. however that information was shared beforehand. gt has themselves to blame, but to be honest they got off pretty easy overall.
why? due to the lazy atlanta media that only wants to dig dirt up on UGA, no local media member put in an open records request for georgia tech and thus this ncaa investigation didn't come out at all. so unlike other programs that have an ncaa investigation being held over their heads and having it locally or even nationally discussed there was nothing until a year and some later when the findings finally came out. the lack of speculation was a big advantage to georgia tech. the local atlanta media was trashed nationally about this.