Jump to content





And Here We Go . . . Firings At State Ethics Commission In Response To Subpoenas To Governor

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
29 replies to this topic

#1 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 16 June 2011 - 11:05 PM

Anyone ELSE Think This is a "Complete Fabrication"?
Ethics official says cutbacks related to Deal investigation

By Aaron Gould Sheinin and James Salzer

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

10:48 p.m. Thursday, June 16, 2011
The head of the state ethics commission said it was no coincidence that she is being pushed from her job while pursuing an investigation into Gov. Nathan Deal's campaign.

In an email obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Stacey Kalberman, the commission's executive secretary, linked the decision to eliminate her assistant's job and deeply cut her own salary to their requests for subpoenas against the governor's campaign. She also revealed in that email to Patrick Millsaps, chairman of the ethics commission, that the state attorney general's office reviewed their work and that the FBI offered to assist in the ethics investigation.

Millsaps said the staff budget cuts have nothing to do with the investigation into complaints filed against Deal's 2010 campaign for governor.

The complaints question how Deal paid for airfare for the campaign, whether he improperly used state campaign funds for legal bills related to a federal ethics investigation and whether he improperly accepted campaign contributions that exceed limits.

But on Tuesday, the same day The Atlanta Journal-Constitution first reported the looming staff shake-up, Kalberman said she was contacted by someone in the governor's office "to assist me in finding a job."

In an interview at her attorney's office, Kalberman would not reveal who called her or what job was offered. The person, she said, "let me know there are options. "

Stephanie Mayfield, a spokesman for the governor, said Kalberman "has been reached out to by our office just to see if she needs help. It was not about any specific job."

Mayfield referred questions about the commission's investigation to the governor's campaign attorney, who could not be reached for comment.

Kalberman said the dispute began when she and her deputy and chief investigator, Sherilyn Streicker, presented draft subpoenas to the commission on May 3. Needing only the chairman's signature to move forward with the investigation, Kalberman said instead she began to receive pointed questions about the agency's budget.

The conflict reached a head last week when Millsaps told her that her deputy's job was being eliminated and Kalberman's own salary was to be cut nearly 30 percent. Millsaps said Kalberman resigned in that meeting on June 9; Kalberman denies that and said she does not intend to leave her job. The commission will meet at 9 a.m. today to settle the matter.

As the dispute between Millsaps and Kalberman became public earlier this week, Kalberman raised the question of whether the chairman's move was related to the Deal investigation.

Millsaps said his motive was budgetary. A major concern, he said, was that Kalberman wanted to spend up to $20,000 remodeling the office and was including a raise in her proposed budget while at the same time saying the commission might not be able to meet new requirements the Legislature imposed this year.

Kalberman said the remodeling was to create training space and a place for the commission to meet. She said that in May she offered to withdraw that proposal.

Millsaps, who became Deal's first appointee to the commission when he was reappointed in February, said he would likely recuse himself from the Deal case anyway.

"We were given something on the Deal case," Millsaps said of the May 3 meeting. "I probably didn't look at it too much."

Millsaps questioned the timing of Kalberman's email.

"It took her a week to come up with that," he said. "I was expecting an accusation about politics. It's a complete fabrication."

Still, Millsaps said the commission will do its duty.

"We have all taken the oath that whoever is in front of us, we are going to take them on if they need to be taken on," he said. "But we've got to keep the lights on while we are doing it."

In the Wednesday email to Millsaps, Kalberman said she had presented budget documents at Millsaps' request, but he didn't want to see them.

"Your stated concern is that we do not have the budget for this investigation," Kalberman wrote. "However, the costs have already been paid. Staff time is built into the budget and, in my opinion, we have sufficient resources going forward."

What's more, she said, "the only impediment to continuing this investigation would be my and my deputy's dismissal."

In the interview Thursday, Kalberman refused to comment on that email, saying it was not intended for public consumption. She also would not comment on what the FBI is doing to assist the investigation and added that the attorney general often assists commission staff in their investigations.

Special Agent Stephen Emmett, a spokesman with the Atlanta office of the FBI, would not comment on whether the bureau had offered to assist the investigation.

But Kalberman said she asked Millsaps about the subpoenas twice between May 3 and May 20. He did not sign them and she described his attitude toward them as "tepid" and "reluctant."

Once, she said, "he admonished me" and said if the commission moved forward, "I want you personally to handle this."

But Millsaps said he doesn't remember that.

"The only thing I ever remember saying about Deal was that I was going to recuse myself because I was a Deal appointee, and that is why I didn't take any interest in the Deal case," Millsaps said. "I was focused on the budget."

Commissioner Kevin Abernethy said he saw draft versions of the Deal subpoenas when the commission met May 3, although he said they were not "presented formally."

Abernethy said commissioners decided not to take any formal action on the Deal case at the time.

"What we decided to do, in the interest of efficiency, is to wait for a formal and final report and not micromanage what the staff was doing," he said.

But that is contrary to how the process usually works, Kalberman said.

"The subpoenas are part of the investigation," she said. "We get the subpoenas to investigate the case."

Instead of signing the subpoenas, Kalberman said that on May 20, Millsaps called for an in-depth review of the commission's budget for the coming fiscal year, a concern that led to last week's meeting.

Kalberman met with Millsaps and Commissioner Hillary Stringfellow on June 9 in Kalberman's office. Millsaps told Kalberman that her deputy's job was being eliminated and her own pay was being cut from $120,000 to $85,000.

Kalberman became emotional and left the room at least once. After the second exit, Millsaps and Stringfellow left. The next day, Millsaps e-mailed Kalberman.

"To follow up on yesterday, we will of course accept your resignation and certainly understand your decision," Millsaps wrote.

An hour later, Kalberman responded, apologized for becoming emotional and said she never resigned.

"I was obviously upset yesterday because, as I explained, I was just informed that my mother was diagnosed with a recurrence of metastatic breast cancer and is very ill," Kalberman wrote. "Your news came at a very unfortunate time. However, I have not as yet made any decisions about my employment."

Kalberman disputed Millsaps' assertion that the commission might run out of money in the middle of the coming fiscal year.

Millsaps waited until Monday to write again. He told Kalberman, "You made your decision about your employment very clear last Thursday."

"You repeatedly stated that 'you would not work' for the lower salary, that we 'would have to find someone else,' and that you were resigning and [sic] 'spend more time with your children,' " he wrote.

Later Monday, Kalberman wrote back to Millsaps: She said she was "stunned by" his allegation that she had resigned and denied that she made those statements.

On Thursday, Kalberman said she would like to keep her job, but "at this point it seems untenable."

Others promised to pay attention to whom the commission hires to replace Kalberman.

William Perry, executive director of Common Cause Georgia, a government watchdog group, said, "The question is, are they going to get anyone who is going to take on these cases, or are they just going to get someone who will roll over?"

Staff writer Chris Joyner contributed to this article.

Edited by holymoses, 17 March 2012 - 12:12 AM.


#2 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 16 June 2011 - 11:18 PM

Rather bizarre that Millsaps would assume that it took Kalberman "a week to come up with that" (link between the firing and Deal subpoenas).   Folks commenting on the an early article in the AJC were "coming up with that" moments after it was announced . . . and that was BEFORE anyone knew about the subpoenas.  Folks knew the investigators were being fired for doing their jobs too well.  Remember, Millsaps was appointed by the Governor.

MORE bizarre is Millsaps claim that he "probably didn't look at" the Deal case too much.

Really????

"Probably"  ???

First, you would think that, if you were a commissioner appointed by the very Governor on whom you were being asked to sign off to be subpoenaed, you would darn well know whether or not you looked at it or not.  There would not be a "probably".

Second . . . you would look at it.  You would remember it.  And, one way or another, you would ACT on it.

Edited by holymoses, 06 July 2011 - 02:07 PM.


#3 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:32 AM

Deal was dirty before he ever took office.  You had to figure it would catch up to him sooner or later, but I'm honestly a little stunned it's this overt.  It takes a lot of hubris to operate like this.

#4 Summerbunny

Summerbunny

    I'M THAT!

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3,069 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 08:04 AM

View PostJDaveG, on 17 June 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Deal was dirty before he ever took office.  You had to figure it would catch up to him sooner or later, but I'm honestly a little stunned it's this overt.  It takes a lot of hubris to operate like this.


Kinda reads like a scene from The Sopranos.  The phone call to "let her know her options", makes me think that she had not resigned but they were going to force her to resign anyway!

#5 mdrake34

mdrake34

    Veteran Falcon

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,550 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 08:08 AM

Should have elected Karen Handel, then we wouldn't be dealing with this.

#6 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 09:26 AM

View Postmdrake34, on 17 June 2011 - 08:08 AM, said:

Should have elected Karen Handel, then we wouldn't be dealing with this.

Once it was clear she was out of the primary, I became a Barnes voter.

Once Barnes decided to do his awful, dirty lowdown attack ads, I became a John Monds voter.

All of which is to say, politicians are stupid, but apparently our voters are worse.

#7 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 03:04 PM

Jay Bookman
‘Transparency commission’ all too transparent

12:25 pm June 17, 2011, by Jay

Here’s how such things go down and get done in Georgia:

The state ethics commission, formally known as the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission, was scheduled to meet at 9 a.m. this morning in its offices across from the Capitol.

The meeting took place in a sparse, cramped, 10-foot-by-20-foot office with barely enough room for a conference table. (The commission, you see, is not exactly popular with the politicians who control its budget.)

At 9:10, 9:15, and 9:20, the meeting had still not begun. The transparency commission’s embattled executive secretary, Stacey Kalberman, was in her office conferring privately with transparency commission member Kent Alexander, a former King and Spalding partner, former U.S. attorney and now general counsel at Emory University. Apparently, certain things had to be explained and arranged before the transparency commission could meet.

At 9:25, their discussion ended, Kalberman and Alexander walked into the small room, the public meeting was formally called into order and the transparency commission immediately voted to go into executive session.

All members of the media and public were escorted out of the transparency commission’s meeting.

An hour later, the executive session ended. The transparency commission reconvened its public session and announced that Kalberman had agreed to resign, but would remain executive secretary during an unspecified period of transition. Her deputy, investigator Sherilyn Streicker, would lose her job due to budget cuts.

All members of the transparency commission lauded the excellent work done by Kalberman.

Kalberman in turn lauded the excellent work done by members of the transparency commission. Somewhere, faint strains of “Kumbaya” could be heard in the room. Or maybe that part was just my imagination. But all was certainly peace and harmony, the tight expressions on certain faces nothwithstanding.

But then the meeting ended.

Kalberman, who had alleged in an internal email that she was being forced out of her job at the transparency commission in order to thwart an ethics investigation of Gov. Nathan Deal, refused to answer media questions, retreated immediately into her office and closed the door.

However, transparency commission members Josh Belinfante and Kevin Abernethy were unable to flee quickly because of the cramped space, and reporters began to ask questions.

Did the commission refuse to approve subpoenas dealing with the Deal investigation at your May 3rd meeting?

“It was never on the agenda,” they responded.

That wasn’t the question. The question was whether the transparency commission had refused to approve those subpoenas as requested by Kalberman.

“The request was never on the agenda.”

With all due respect, you’re not answering the question, and you know it. Did you refuse to approve the subpoenas?

“There was no official request on the agenda.”

You’re not answering the question.

“No such request was on the agenda.”

The members of the transparency commission then left the room, still refusing to answer questions.

That’s how things get done at the transparency commission.

– Jay Bookman

#8 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 09:33 PM

http://www.myfoxatla...-up-20110617-es

Fox does a pretty good story here, but they also take a still of the most unflattering video ever seen of my wife and use it when they show her email.  Thanks guys . . . she really appreciates that.  Why couldn't you just get a picture from her facebook site . . . you know, like when she had gotten some SLEEP or something . . .

BTW, in response to Dave's post above, and at about 1;11 and 1:18 . . . I am out of picture of hesitating considerably longer than D.J. Carrasco's balk last night to give the commission members more time to squirm in front of the reporters before they can boogie out the door.

#9 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 17 June 2011 - 11:23 PM

Wow!  Doesn't get much clearer than that, does it?

#10 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 18 June 2011 - 07:41 AM

Sorry.  I have not had any sleep either.

#11 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:07 AM

View Postholymoses, on 18 June 2011 - 07:41 AM, said:

Sorry.  I have not had any sleep either.

:lol:

I was talking about the clip -- they pretty much made it clear how things went down.

#12 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 20 June 2011 - 12:31 PM

Posted Image

#13 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 20 June 2011 - 06:37 PM

View Postholymoses, on 20 June 2011 - 12:31 PM, said:

Posted Image

Awesome.

#14 The Monarch

The Monarch

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,118 posts

Posted 20 June 2011 - 08:28 PM

View Postmdrake34, on 17 June 2011 - 08:08 AM, said:

Should have elected Karen Handel, then we wouldn't be dealing with this.
I voted for Kodos.

#15 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 20 June 2011 - 09:29 PM

View PostJDaveG, on 20 June 2011 - 06:37 PM, said:

Awesome.

Recognize the dogs from my Avatar?  

Sorry . . . Screw anonymity.

Edited by holymoses, 20 June 2011 - 09:36 PM.


#16 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 20 June 2011 - 09:58 PM

View Postholymoses, on 20 June 2011 - 09:29 PM, said:

Recognize the dogs from my Avatar?  

Sorry . . . Screw anonymity.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

#17 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 21 June 2011 - 10:04 AM

OK, I'm writing my 11 year old son who has been at camp for two weeks.  Any suggestions on explaining why his mom is going to be out of a job?

#18 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 21 June 2011 - 10:09 AM

View Postholymoses, on 21 June 2011 - 10:04 AM, said:

OK, I'm writing my 11 year old son who has been at camp for two weeks.  Any suggestions on explaining why his mom is going to be out of a job?

"Son, the governor's a doosh."

The end.

#19 holymoses

holymoses

    Starting Lineup

  • Forum Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 21 June 2011 - 08:09 PM

You can't make this stuff up . . . now yours truly  . . .  HolyMoses/duckettplease . . . is being investigated as a "Democratic Operative" . . . folks are even checking into MY campaign contributions.   [I'm SO proud!!!!]

This is absurd for two reasons:  First . . . . my occasional rantings on this board represent the entirety of my political activism.

Second, it wouldn't matter if I was James Freakin' Carville.  My wife won't listen to me!

#20 JDaveG

JDaveG

    I Heart Matt Ryan, and not just on Thursdays

  • Pure Football
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,963 posts

Posted 21 June 2011 - 08:26 PM

View Postholymoses, on 21 June 2011 - 08:09 PM, said:

You can't make this stuff up . . . now yours truly  . . .  HolyMoses/duckettplease . . . is being investigated as a "Democratic Operative" . . . folks are even checking into MY campaign contributions.   [I'm SO proud!!!!]

This is absurd for two reasons:  First . . . . my occasional rantings on this board represent the entirety of my political activism.

Second, it wouldn't matter if I was James Freakin' Carville.  My wife won't listen to me!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:    

If it makes you feel better, I took Newt Gingrich's class, "Renewing American Civilization," when I was in college.  I was notified a few years later that Congress was subpoenaing my records from the class for an ethics investigation.

So, there is a file somewhere in Washington D.C. with my class records in it trying to demonstrate that I am a consumer of influence peddling (which is funny because there is no one -- and I mean no one -- who has less use for Newt Gingrich than I do).

Oh, and they know I got an A in the class   :D