Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:51 PM
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:14 PM
Yeah, I guess we should stick with Bryant for now. I remember when we first got him, during a game, the play by play guy said Matt Bryant is coming in to kick a FG and at first I thought he said Matt Ryan, and I was like huh? Ryan's kicking FG's?! Then I relized he said Bryant & not Ryan. I laughed at myself. That's why it's important to pay close attention during Falcon games!
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:20 PM
In his first year with Cincinnati in 2003, Graham set a franchise record by making 88% (22 of 25) of his field goals. In the following season, Graham narrowly missed equalling his previous mark, finishing the year 27 of 31 (87.1%). In 2005, Graham made 28 of 32 field goals (87.5%), scored a franchise record 131 points, was selected to be the kicker for the AFC Pro Bowl squad, and helped the Bengals record their first winning season since 1990. Graham was the first kicker in franchise history ever to be selected to play in a pro bowl.
In 2007, Graham missed his first field goal attempt of the season (a 53-yard attempt). But after that, he set set a Bengals record by kicking 21 consecutive field goals without a miss over the season's first 10 games. This included a game against the Baltimore Ravens where he set a franchise record by kicking 7 field goals (the second highest total in NFL history). His streak came to an end when he unexpectedly missed a 26-yard attempt in game 11. By the end of the season, Graham set new franchise records for field goals in a season (31) and field goal percentage (91.2)
On January 9, 2010, Graham missed two field goals during the Bengals' 24-14 wild card playoff loss to the New York Jets, including a 28-yard attempt that would have cut the score to 24-17 late in the fourth quarter.
Posted 04 March 2010 - 05:39 PM
Posted 04 March 2010 - 10:33 PM
the bengals were never in that game. they never stood a chance. the bengals choked, and placing the blame on a kicker who missed 2 fgs that wouldnt even have tied the game is ridiculous. he has been money throughout his career and one bad game shouldnt deem him unusable. who in fa or the draft are you seeing as a better option? lets get real.
you dont go from being franchised one season to scrub the next. its not like cincy doesnt want him, im sure theyre trying to work out a deal with him RIGHT NOW. last year proved how vital a reliable kicker can be. jay feely should have taught you that.
Posted 04 March 2010 - 10:42 PM
Posted 04 March 2010 - 10:52 PM
so matt bryant is better than nate kaeding and neil rackers too right?